Chapter published in:
Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 7090
References

References

Allauzen, A., & Bonneau-Maynard, H.
(2008) Training and evaluation of POS taggers on the French MULTITAG corpus. In N. Morales, J. Tejedor, J. Garrido, et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Sixth Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08). http://​www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2008/Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolly, C.
(2008) Les unites phraséologiques (UP): un phénomène ‘complexe’? Etude des sequences (semi-)figées construites avec les verbs ‘prendre’ et ‘donner’. De la description en français L1 à l’acquisitions en L2. Doctoral Dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G.
(2015) A dictionary gives definitions, not decisions. Response 1 to ‘On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words’. Metaphor and the Social World 5(1), 137–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grevisse, M., & Goosse, A.
(1993) Le bon usage. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, P.
(2016) How elites talk about their political career: Metaphors in spontaneous and informal political discourse. Paper presented at the 11th conference of the association for Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM), Berlin, Germany.
Krennmayr, T.
(2008) Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. In N.-L. Johannesson & D. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
(2011) Metaphor in newspapers. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. http://​dare​.ubvu​.vu​.nl​/handle​/1871​/19774Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ly, A.
(2011) Combattre le changement climatique: Réflexions sur les métaphores du climat au Parlement européen. Signes, Discours et Sociétés 7. https://​www​.researchgate​.net​/publication​/301287215​_Combattre​_le​_changement​_climatique​_reflexions​_sur​_les​_metaphores​_du​_climat​_au​_Parlement​_europeenGoogle Scholar
Nicaise, L.
(2011) On going beyond the literal: Translating metaphorical conceptualizations in financial discourse. Meta 562, 407–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasma, T.
(2011) Metaphor and register variation: The personalization of Dutch news discourse. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. http://​dare​.ubvu​.vu​.nl​/handle​/1871​/19630Google Scholar
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M.
(2014) Deliberate metaphors in political discourse: The case of citizen discourse. Metaphorik.de 25, 7–41.Google Scholar
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015) Folle machine ou solide relation « living apart together » ? Mots. Les langages du politique 109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, G.
(2010) Op zoek naar metaforen in het Frans. Kan de Metaphor Identification Procedure ze helpen vinden? [In search of metaphors in French: Can the Metaphor Identification Procedure help find them?]. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 83, 55–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.
(1994) Probabilistic part of speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (pp. 44–49). Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
(1995) Improvements in Part-of-Speech tagging with an application to German. Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop. Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Biernacka, E., Dorst, A. G., Kaal, A. A., López-Rodríguez, I., & Pasma, T.
(2010) Pragglejaz in practice: Finding metaphorically used words in natural discourse. In: G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, D.
(1993) Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 273–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Dictionaries used

Le Grand Dictionnaire Hachette-Oxford
(2005) Electronic version [computer software] Paris: Hachette Education.Google Scholar
Le Grand Robert & Collins
(2017) Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert [Online edition]. Retrieved from: http://​grand​-robert​-collins​.lerobert​.com​/fr/.Google Scholar
Le Petit Larousse
(2018) Paris: Larousse [Online edition]. Retrieved from: http://​www​.larousse​.fr​/dictionnaires​/francais​-monolingue.Google Scholar
Le Petit Robert de la Langue Française
(2017) Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert [Online edition]. Retrieved from: www​.lerobert​.com.Google Scholar
Trésor de la langue Française informatisé
(2018) Retrieved from: http://​atilf​.atilf​.fr/Google Scholar