Chapter published in:
Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 4267
References

References

Archer, D., Wilson, A., & Rayson, P.
(2002) Introduction to the USAS category system. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/usas​/usas​_guide​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
(2003): Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 18(3), 149–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canty, A., & Ripley, B.
(2015) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions, R package version 1.3-20. https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/boot​/index​.html
Deignan, A.
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 106–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G.
(2015) A dictionary gives definitions, not decision. Response 1 to ‘On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words’. Metaphor and the Social World 5(1), 137–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, A. G., Reijnierse, W. G., & Venhuizen, G.
(2013) One small step for MIP towards automated metaphor identification? Formulating general rules to determine basic meanings in large-scale approaches to metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 3(1), 77–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P.
(2012) irr: Various Coefficients of Inter-rater Reliability and Agreement, R package version 0.84. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=irr
Howell, D. C.
(2010) Statistical methods for psychology, Seventh Ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Koller, V.
(2002) “A shotgun wedding”: Co-occurrence of war and marriage metaphors in mergers and acquisitions discourse, Metaphor and Symbol 17(3), 179–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J.
(2017) VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. In J. Pustejovsky & N. E. Ide (Eds.), Handbook of linguistic annotation (pp. 1053–1072). Berlin: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lew, R.
(2013) Identifying, ordering and defining senses. In H. Jackson (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to lexicography (pp. 284–302). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L.
(2012) Inter-rater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22(3), 276–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nacey, S.
(2013) Metaphors in learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J.
(2018) DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics 2(2), 129–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. (2018) Metaphor, cancer and the end of life. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: Analyzing metaphor in poetry. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains, gaps (pp. 197–226). Berlin: Mouton du Gruyter.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, G.
(1999) Metaphors and dictionaries: The morass of meaning or how to get two ideas for one. International Journal of Lexicography 12(3), 195–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar