Chapter published in:
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 275301
References

References

Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Sandler, W.
(2005) The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 81(2), 301–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W.
(2005) Morphological universals and the sign language type. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2004 (pp. 19–39). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bottari, D., Caclin, A., Giard, M-H., & Pavani, F.
(2011) Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals. PLoS ONE, 6(9), 1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D.
(1998) A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cormier, K.
(2007) Do all pronouns point? Indexicality of first person plural pronouns in BSL and ASL. In P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure (pp. 63–101). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C.
(2000) La langue des Signes Française (LSF), Les voies de l’iconicité. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
(2004) Phonétique de la LSF: une formalisation problématique. Silexicales, Actes du Colloque, Linguistique de la LSF: recherches actuelles, 93–113.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D.
(1998) The knowing ear. An Australian test of universal claims about the semantic structure of sensory verbs and their extension into the domain of cognition. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. D., & Gong, Q.
(2010) Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages (pp. 499–518). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, N.
(1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51, 696–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
(1997) Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & Narrog, H.
(2010) Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In: Heine, B. & Narrog, H. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 407-428.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T.
(2008) Corpus linguistics and signed languages: no lemmata, no corpus. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora. Marrakech, Morocco, June 2018.Google Scholar
Kisch, S.
(2008) “Deaf discourse”: The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community. Medical Anthropology, 27(3), 283–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacSweeney, M., Woll, B., Campbell, R., McGuire, P. K., & David, A. S.
(2002) Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users. Brain, 125(7), 1583–1593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palfreyman, N.
(2017) Variation in Indonesian Sign Language: A typological and sociolinguistic analysis. Lancaster: Ishara Press and Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Palfreyman, N., Sagara, K., & U. Zeshan
(2015) Methods in carrying out language typological research. In E. Orfanidou, B. Woll, & G. Morgan (Eds.), Research methods in sign language studies (pp. 173–192). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M.
(2011) Grammaticalization in sign languages. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 681–693). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Padden, C. A.
(2011) The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 503–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A., & Johnston, T.
(2012) Sociolinguistic aspects of variation and change. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, (pp. 788–816). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, M., & Pfau, R.
(2007) Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In P. Perniss, R. Pfau, & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure (pp. 303–339). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, M.
(2008) Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations (pp. 341–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B.
(2000) Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: Festschrift for Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 213–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zeshan, U.
(2003) Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages. In R. M. Dixon, & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 153–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Sign Language Typology Series No. 1. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. & Perniss, P.
(2008) Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages. Sign Language Typology Series No. 2. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Zeshan, U. & Palfreyman, N.
(2017) Sign language typology. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 178–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeshan, U., & Sagara, K.
(Eds.) (2016) Semantic Fields in Sign Languages: Colour, Kinship and Quantification. Sign Language Typology Series No. 6. Berlin: De Gruyter and Lancaster: Ishara Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U. & De Vos, C.
(2012) Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton & Lancaster: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Zeshan U., Escobedo Delgado, C.E., Dikyuva, H., Panda, S. & De Vos, C.
(2013) Cardinal numerals in village sign languages: Approaching cross-modal typology, Linguistic Typology 17(3): 357-396.Google Scholar