Chapter published in:Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 253–274
Evidential vindication in next turn
Using the retrospective “see?” in conversation
Perception verbs are frequent in conversation across diverse languages and cultures. This chapter presents a case study of a recurrent but previously undocumented use of the perception verb see in everyday English conversation. Using conversation analysis, the chapter explicates the use of “See?” – the verb see produced with rising intonation as a possibly complete turn-constructional unit – as claim of evidential vindication. With “See?” a speaker claims a just prior turn, action, or event as support for a previous assertive action. The analysis demonstrates that the practice exploits two distinct forms of sequence organisation, adjacency pairs and retro-sequences, and reflects on the fit between the perception verb see and the action it implements within this practice.
Keywords: conversation analysis, sequence organisation, retro-sequences, social action, perception verbs, perceptual metaphor, evidence, disputes, English
Published online: 21 February 2019
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Storch, A.
Curl, T. S.
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D.
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H.
Kendrick, K. H.
Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P.
Levinson, S. C.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., Van Putten, S., & Majid, A.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A.
Schegloff, E. A.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
Stokes, D., & Biggs, S.
Vázquez Carranza, A.