Chapter published in:
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 43–64

Perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics

Scope, motivation, and lexicalisation

This chapter presents an up-to-date retrospective on the study of perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics. After a brief introduction to some of the main theoretical tools for the analysis of conceptual metaphor, three main areas are discussed: the scope of perception metaphors, the motivation for perception metaphors, and the lexicalisation of perception metaphors. The chapter ends with some indications for future work in this area.
Keywords: perception metaphors, scope, embodiment, multimodal, cross-linguistic
Published online: 21 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.03iba
References

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Storch, A.
(2013) Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & A. Storch (Eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culturek (pp. 1–46). Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bacci, F., & Melcher, D.
(Eds.) (2013) Art and the senses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, B.
(2015) Embodiment. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 10–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R., & Sekuler, R.
(2005) Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D.
(1949) A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2014) Ways of perceiving, moving, and thinking: revindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 268–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., Suárez-Toste, E., & Paradis, C.
in press). On wine. Sensory perceptions, communication and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Classen, C.
(1997) Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. International Social Science Journal, 49(3), 401–412.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D.
(2000) In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farias, A. R., Garrido, M. V., & Semin, G. R.
(2013) Converging modalities ground abstract categories: The case of politics. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60971.Crossref
Fay, A. J., & Maner, J. K.
(2012) Warmth, spatial proximity, and social attachment: The embodied perception of a social metaphor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1369–1372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(ed.) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, N.
(2010) The event structure of perception verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goldstein, E. B.
(Ed.) (2005) Blackwell handbook of sensation and perception. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2010) Encyclopedia of perception. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(2007) Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 188–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, D.
(Ed.) (1991) The varieties of sensory experience. A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Sensual relations. Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2004) Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. C., Fendrich, R., & Streeter, S. E.
(2015) The diversity of human experience. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities (pp. 397–326). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(1999a) Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
(1999b) Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell. In R. W., Jr. Gibbs, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 29–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002)  mind-as-body as a cross-linguistic conceptual metaphor. Miscelánea. A Journal of English and American Studies, 25, 93–119.Google Scholar
(2006) Cross-linguistic polysemy in tactile verbs. In J. Luchenbroers (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics investigations across languages, fields, and philosophical boundaries (pp. 235–253). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
(2013a) The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In R. Caballero, & J. Diaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition: Explorations into human sentience -imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 109–133). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In press). The domain of olfaction in Basque. In Ł. Jędrzejowski, & P. Staniewski Eds. Linguistics of olfaction Amsterdam John Benjamins
Jarque, Mª J., & Pascual, E.
(2015) Direct discourse expressing evidential values in Catalan Sign Language. eHumanista/IVITRA, 8, 421–445.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, reason and imagination. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
(2008) Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture, 8(3), 348–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K.
(2012) Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120(3), 416–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, D. S., Kim, E., & Schwarz, N.
(2015) Something smells fishy: Olfactory suspicion cues improve performance on the Moses illusion and Wason rule discovery task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 47–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N.
(2012) Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefevre, R.
(2011) Rude hand gestures of the world. A guide to offending without words. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A.
(2009) Wine and conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C.-B., & Galinsky, A. D.
(2010) The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21(3), 381–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C.
(2011) The senses in language and culture. Senses and Society, 6(1), 5–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M.
(2015) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D.
(1992) Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nudds, M.
(2015) Is audio-visual perception ‘amodal’ or ‘crossmodal’?. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities (pp. 166–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C.
(2015) Not all perceptual experience is modality specific. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities (pp. 133–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pandya, V.
(1993) Above the forest: A study of Andamanese ethnoanemology, cosmology and the power of ritual. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohrer, T.
(2007) Embodiment and experientialism. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rojo, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(Eds.) (2013) Cognitive linguistics and translation. Advances in some theoretical models and applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A.
(2002) Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., & Demjén, Z.
(2017) The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Serres, M.
(2008) The five senses. A philosophy of mingled bodies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N.
(2011) Tough and tender: Embodied categorization of gender. Psychological Science, 22(1), 26–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Ch., & Bayne, T.
(2015) Is conciousness multisensory?. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities (pp. 95–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, D., Matthen, M., & Biggs, S.
(Eds.) (2015) Perception and its modalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J.
(2017) Meaning in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, M.
(2008) Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations (pp. 343–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, A.
(2008) Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In M. Á. Gómez-González, J. L. Mackenzie, & E. M. González-Álvarez (Eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast and comparison (pp. 123–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yu, N.
(2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], Crossref logo
Jumaah, Ruaa Talal, Sabariah Md Rashid, Mohd Azidan Bin Abdul Jabar & Afida Mohamad Ali
2020. A Cognitive Semantic Analysis of Arabic Verb of Visual Perception رأى (ra’a) in Fiction Writing. SAGE Open 10:3 ► pp. 215824402094952 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.