Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective
Editors
| Princeton University
| University of Helsinki
This volume gives an easily accessible, yet comprehensive, sophisticated, and example-rich introduction to Construction Grammar as it has been developed from the early 1980’s by Charles J. Fillmore and his associates. It also provides a succinct account of the historical and intellectual background of the model and shows how Construction Grammar can easily be applied to typologically very different languages and to a variety of language-specific phenomena. All of the contributors to the volume came out of the Fillmorean school at UC-Berkeley and have worked consistently on applying and further developing the model in various domains of linguistic analysis.
The 'Thumbnail sketch' by Fried & Östman is the only extensive introduction published so far to Fillmorean Construction Grammar.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 2] 2004. vi, 209 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
1–10
|
|
|
11–86
|
|
|
87–119
|
|
|
121–155
|
|
|
157–199
|
|
|
Index
|
201–208
|
“[...] a valuable source for anyone interested in current research in Construction Grammar. The structure of the book seems unusual in combining a textbook introduction with research articles. This combination however turns out to be very useful, as it allows the reader to familiarize with the theoretical framework before seeing it applied to a number of different phenomena.”
Martin Hilpert, Rice University, in Studies in Language, Vol. 31:2 (2007)
“The book as a whole is an interesting introduction to Construction Grammar as a formal theory of language, and shows that the framework is sufficiently flexible and accurate to account for linguistic facts across languages. The volume, and in particular Chapter 2, will thus be an extremely useful reference for anyone interested in constructional approaches.”
Valeria Quochi, Linguistics Department, University of Pisa, Italy, on Linguist List, Vol. 16.2277 (2005)
“[...] the utility (and interest) of this book is the attempt to test, through a collection of different case studies related to different languages, the application of the constructional approach outside the model of English.”
Francesca Di Garbo, University of Palermo, on Linguist List 20.1297
Cited by
Cited by 31 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Auxiliary Selection in Spanish [Studies in Language Companion Series, 155],
No author info given
2018.
In Conceptual Semantics [Constructional Approaches to Language, 23],
No author info given
2020.
In Frame-Constructional Verb Classes [Constructional Approaches to Language, 28],
Andersson, Peter
2014. The fast case: Constructionalization of a Swedish concessive.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa & Aneider Iza Erviti
2018. Genre as cognitive construction.
Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 576 ff.
Barbu, Ana-Maria
2014.
In Noun Valency [Studies in Language Companion Series, 158],
► pp. 113 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2011. Review of Boas (2010): Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 429 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2016. Review of Boas & Gonzálvez-García (2014): Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 235 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 203 ff.
Hilpert, Martin & Jan-Ola Östman
2014. Reflections on Constructions across Grammars.
Constructions and Frames 6:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Holvoet, Axel
2016.
In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],
► pp. 83 ff.
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016.
In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],
► pp. 1 ff.
Hung, Steffi H.
2021. Manual action motivates networked meanings of a productive construction in Mandarin.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal
Koch, Peter
2014.
In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327],
► pp. 71 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014. Introduction.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:3 ► pp. 435 ff.
Lavine, James E.
2016.
In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],
► pp. 107 ff.
Levisen, Carsten
2021. The syntax of something: Evaluative affordances of noget in Danish construction grammar.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2019.
In Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese [Human Cognitive Processing, 67],
► pp. 47 ff.
Luzondo Oyón, Alba
2014. Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin
2018.
In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22],
► pp. 1 ff.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Tiago Timponi Torrent, Adrieli Laviola, Linnéa Bäckström, Anna Helga Hannesdóttir & Ely Edison da Silva Matos
2018.
In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22],
► pp. 255 ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2009.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Perek, Florent & Martin Hilpert
2014. Constructional tolerance.
Constructions and Frames 6:2 ► pp. 266 ff.
Pfänder, Stefan, Heike Behrens, Peter Auer, Daniel Jacob, Rolf Kailuweit, Lars Konieczny, Bernd Kortmann, Christian Mair & Gerhard Strube
2013. Erfahrung zählt. Frequenzeff ekte in der Sprache–ein Werkstattbericht.
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 43:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, Alba Luzondo Oyón & Paula Pérez Sobrino
2017.
In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],
► pp. 1 ff.
Schulze, Mathias & Kyle Scholz
2016.
In Language-Learner Computer Interactions [Language Studies, Science and Engineering, 2],
► pp. 65 ff.
Sidiropoulou, Maria & Efpraxia Tsapaki
2014. Conceptualisations across English–Greek parallel press data: a foreign language teaching perspective.
The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2015.
In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18],
► pp. 107 ff.
Stickles, Elise, Oana David, Ellen K. Dodge & Jisup Hong
2016. Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory.
Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Wittenberg, Eva, Ray Jackendoff, Gina Kuperberg, Martin Paczynski, Jesse Snedeker & Heike Wiese
2014.
In Structuring the Argument [Language Faculty and Beyond, 10],
► pp. 61 ff.
Добровольский, Дмитрий, Михаил Копотев & Людмила Пёппель
2019. Группа конструкций ну и Х: семантика, прагматика, сочетаемость.
Scando-Slavica 65:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General