Article published in:
Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical
Edited by Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Tuomas Huumo
[Constructional Approaches to Language 16] 2015
► pp. 205228
References

References

Bauer, Brigitte
(2000) Archaic syntax in Indo-European: The spread of transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergsland, Knut
(1997) Aleut grammar. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Blume, Kerstin
(2000) Markierte Valenzen im Sprachvergleich: Lizenzierungs- und Linkingbedingungen. Linguistische Arbeiten 411. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George A.
(2006) A choctaw reference grammar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
(1989) Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Second revised ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
(1994) Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Reuse, Willem J., & Goode, Phillip
(2006) A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
(1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
(1987) The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 64, 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Pål K., Kittilä, Seppo & Kolehmainen, Leena
(2010) Linguistics of Weather: Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions. Studies in Language, 34, 565–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finnish Text Collection. Selection of electronic research material that contains written Finnish newspaper texts from 1990’s
Compiled by: The Research Institute for the Languages of Finland, The Department of General Linguistics at the University of Helsinki and The Foreign Languages Department of the University of Joensuu. Available through: CSC – IT Center for Science, http://​www​.csc​.fi.
François, Alexandre
(2001) Contraintes de structures et liberté dans l’organisation du discours. Une description du mwotlap, langue océanienne du Vanuatu. Doctoral thesis in linguistics, Université Paris-IV Sorbonne.
Givón, Talmy
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Syntax: An introduction (Vol. I). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
(2001) Syntax in the making. The emergence of syntactic units in Finnish conversation. Studies in discourse and grammar 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, George
(1996) Georgian: A learner’s grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hummel, Martin
(2004) Zur Valenz der Witterungsverben: dt. regnen, engl. to rain, fr. pleuvoir, it. piovere, pt. chover und sp. llover. In Alberto Gil et al., (Eds.), Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Zeugnisse für Vielfalt und Profil eines Faches. Festschrift für Christian Schmitt zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 35–58). Band II. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
(1997) Partitiivisubjekti ja tilajatkumot. Sananjalka, 39, 65–97.Google Scholar

Huumo, Tuomas
(2003) Incremental existence. The world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics, 41(3), 461–493.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
(1976) Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 303–333). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kolehmainen, Leena
(2010) Sääverbien syntaksia ja semantiikkaa: Semanttiset roolit, osallistujien vaihteleva käsitteistäminen ja sääverbien vaihteleva valenssi. Virittäjä, 1/2010, 5–38.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
[1991] (2002) Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar (2nd ed.). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[1991] (2006) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. II). Descriptive application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Hovdhaugen, Even
(1992) Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul
(2000) The hausa language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria
(2001) A grammar of udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
(1999) Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Linguistische Arbeiten 393. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren
(1990) Grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon, & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo
(2004) Faroese: An overview and reference grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Google Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria
(1989) Free word order in Finnish. Its syntax and discourse functions. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 500. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J., & McKenzie, Parker
(1984) A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Watters, David E.
(2002) A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ferrarotti, Lorenzo
2019.  In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251],  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Yeh, Rihan
2018. Three Types of Traffic in Tijuana. Public Culture 30:3  pp. 441 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.