Universals in Second Scholasticism

A comparative study with focus on the theories of Francisco Suárez S.J. (1548-1617), João Poinsot O.P. (1589-1644) and Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O.F.M. Conv. (1602-1673)/Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M. Conv. (1600-1676)

Daniel Heider

| Faculty of Theology, University of South Bohemia, Institute of Philosophy, The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027214645 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027270672 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00

This study aims to present a comparative analysis of philosophical theories of universals espoused by the foremost representatives of the three main schools of early modern scholastic thought. The book introduces the doctrines of Francisco Suárez, S.J. (1548–1617), the Thomist John of St. Thomas, O.P. (1589–1644), and the Scotists Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola, O.F.M. Conv. (1602–1673) and Bonaventura Belluto, O.F.M. Conv. (1600–1676). The author examines in detail their mutual doctrinal delineation as well as the conceptualist tenet of the Jesuit Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza (1578–1641), whose thought constitutes an important systematic point of comparison especially with Suárez’s doctrine. The book offers the first comparative elaboration of the issue of universals, in both its metaphysical and its epistemological aspects, in the era of second scholasticism.

[Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, 54] 2014. xi, 344 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/bsp.54

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments	vii
1. Introduction	1–22
2. Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) on universals	23–98
3. João Poinsot (1589–1644) on universals	99–176
4. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602–1673)/Bonaventura Belluto (1600–1676) on universals	177–300
5. Concluding comparison and evaluation	301–312
Appendix: Bio-bibliographies	313–318
Bibliography	319–332
Index of names	333–335
Subject index	337–344

“Die vorliegende Arbeit ist ein überaus wichtiger Beitrag zu diesem Gebiet. Sie leistet die Untersuchung der Universalienlehre zudem nicht an einem einzelnen Autor, sondern in komparatistischer Weise im Vergleich der wichtigsten Autoren der Jesuiten (Suárez), der dominikanischen Thomisten (Poinsot/Johannes a S. Thoma) und der franziskanischen Skotisten (Mastri/Belluto). […] Die methodische und quellenmäßige Durchführung der Arbeit kann uneingeschränkt als exzellent eingestuft werden. Mit größtmöglicher Klarheit werden die einzelnen Positionen und Argumente Schritt für Schritt entfaltet und beleuchtet, historisch eingeordnet und in ihrer Valenz bewertet.”

Prof. Dr. Dr. Ulrich G. Leinsle, Universität Regensburg

“Daniel Heider´s book on the universals in three major representatives of the so-called Second Scholasticism is a detailed examination based on close reading of the relevant primary sources and gives access to the debate as it was lead among the philosophers of the 17th century. It proves the author's intimate familiarity with the issues and his mastery of the philosophical questions. […] Heider proves himself to be an outstanding scholar and specialist of the 17th century school philosophy and of present-day epistemology.”

Prof. Dr. Paul Richard Blum, Loyola University Maryland

“The great strength of this book is Heider's masterful, detailed examination of three representative accounts from sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Scholasticism. Suárez offers an orginal blend of Thomist, Scotist and nominalist elements; Poinsot's account is more purely ad mentem Thomi, while Mastri and Belluto take an approach ad mentem Scoti. Of course, there were other streams of thought in the period, but Heider reasonably takes these to be the most important ones. In addition to a familiarity with the primary texts that few could rival, he has an exemplary command of the secondary literature. A key benefit of this erudition is that his analysis is not limited to the narrow ontological problem of universals, but also encompasses the psychological questions about the processes of cognition and the formation of universal concepts.”

Sydney Penner, Asbury University, in Journal of Jesuit Studies 2 (2015)

“The debate on universals is, generally speaking, a well-known subject in the history of philosophy, but views on universals from the end of the sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth century—the object of Heider’s welcome contribution—are quite neglected. [...] The virtue of the book, no doubt a reference for research on the subject, lies in painstakingly following the full complexities of the debate being analyzed. It is also successful in approaching the subject in a comparative way (Heider’s comparisons extend, in fact, to many more authors than the three main ones structuring the volume). In this way, and not insignificantly, the author conveys the eminently dialogical way in which Second Scholastic positions developed through reacting to one another.”

Caterina Tarlazzi, University of Cambridge, in Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. 54:1 (2016)

Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

No author info given

2016. In Metaphysik im Barockscotismus [Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, 57],

Ballor, Jordan J.

2017. In Aquinas Among the Protestants, ► pp. 25 ff.

Forlivesi, Marco

2014. In Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, ► pp. 1 ff.

Guzzardi, Luca

2020. In Ruggiero Boscovich’s Theory of Natural Philosophy [Science Networks. Historical Studies, 60], ► pp. 93 ff.

Hanke, Miroslav

2019. Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 40:4 ► pp. 355 ff.

Perler, Dominik

2020. Can We Know Substances? Suárez on a Sceptical Puzzle. Theoria

Salas, Victor

2019. Rodrigo de Arriaga, S. J. (1592--1667) on Analogy and the Concept of Being. Res Philosophica 96:1 ► pp. 91 ff.

Salas, Victor M.

2014. In Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

Bibliography

Primary literature (including English translations)

Francisco Suárez

Opera omnia

(28 vols.), ed. by C. Berton, Paris 1856-78.

Disputationes metaphysicae

, vols. 25/26, Paris 1866 (reprint: Hildesheim 1965).

Commentaria ac disputationes in tertiam partem D. Thomae tomus tertius

, tomus vigesimus, Paris 1860.

Commentaria ac disputationes in primampartem D. Thomae De Deo uno et trino

, tomus primus, Paris 1856.

Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis “De anima

”, ed. by Salvador Castellote Cubells, 3 vols., Madrid 1992 URL: http://www.salvadorcastellote.com/investigacion.htm

English translations

Doyle, John P.

1995, On Beings of Reason. Metaphysical Disputation LIV , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 33), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1995.

2004, A Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Index locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis) , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 40), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2004.

2006, On Real Relation. Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 42), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2006.

Gracia, Jorge J. E.

1982, Francis Suarez on Individuation: Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and Its Principle , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Jorge J. E. Gracia (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 23), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1982.

Kronen, John D., Reedy, Jeremiah D.

2000, On the Formal Cause of Substance. Metaphysical Disputation XV , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John D. Kronen and Jeremiah D. Reedy (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 36), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2000.

Ross, James F.

1964, On Formal and Universal Unity. Metaphysical Disputation VI , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by James F. Ross (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 15), Milwaukee, Wisconsion 1964.

Vollert, Cyril, S. J.

1947, On the Various Kinds of Distinctions. Metaphysical Disputation VII , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Cyril Vollert (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 4), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1947.

Wells, Norman, J.

1983, On the Essence of Finite Being as Such, on the Existence of that Essence and Their Distinction. Metaphysical disputation XXXI , transl. and with an introd. by N. J. Wells (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 24), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1983.

João Poinsot (Ioannes a S. Thoma)

Cursus theologicus in Summam theologicam d. Thomae

(10 vols.), Paris 1883-86.

Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus

(3 vols.), Turin 1948-50 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 2008).

English translations

Deely, John N.

1985, Tractatus de signis. The Semiotic of John Poinsot , interpretative arrangement by J. Deely, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1985.

Glanville, John J., G. D. Hollenhorst, Y. R. M. Simon

1949, “Entia Rationis and Second Intentions by John of St. Thomas,” The New Scholasticism 23/4 (1949), 395-413.

Simon, Yves René M., J. J. Glanville, G. D. Hollenhorst

1955, The Material Logic of John of St. Thomas. Basic Treatises , Chicago, London 1955.

Wade, Francis C.

Outlines of Formal Logic , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Francis C. Wade (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 8), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1955.

Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola/Bonaventura Belluto Philosophiae ad mentem Scoti cursus integer (5 vols.), Venice 1727.

Other authors

Aristoteles

, Metaphysics , Books 1-9, transl. by H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1933.

, On the Soul , with an English transl. by W. S. Hett, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1936.

, On Interpretation , ed. and transl. by H. P. Cooke and H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1938.

, Categories , ed. and transl. by H. P. Cooke, H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1938.

, Posterior Analytics , ed. and transl. by H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London1960.

, The Complete Works of Aristotle , ed. by J. Barnes, transl. by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, Princeton 1995.

Arriaga, Rodrigo de

, Cursus philosophicus , Paris 1639 URL: http://capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/ARRIAGA/Arriaga_Cursus_philosophicus.pdf

Avicenna

, Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina V-X, ed. by S. Van Riet, Louvain/ Leiden 1980.

Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus

, In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta , ed. by S. Brandt, Vienna/ Leipzig 1906.

Complutenses Discalceati,

Disputationes in Aristotelis dialecticam , Lyons 1668 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 1977).

Carleton, Thomas Compton

Philosophia universa , Antwerp 1649.

Collegium Conimbricense

Commentaria in universam dialecticam Aristotelis Stagiritae, Coimbra 1606 . URL: http://capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/CONIMBRICENSES/CONIMBRI-CENSES%201606%20Dialectica,%20vol.%201.pdf

Fabri, Filippo

Philosophia naturalis Ioan. Duns Scoti ex quattuor libris Sententiarum et Quodli-betis collecta , Venice 1622.

Fonseca, Petrus

Commentaria in libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis (4 vols.), Cologne 1615. URL: http://capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/FONSECA/FONSECA%20Metaphysica%20vol.%203.pdf

Franciscus Toletus

Opera omnia philosophica I-III , Cologne 1615-1616 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 1985).

Frassen, Claude

Philosophia academica , Venice 1767.

Guillelmus de Ockham

, Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum Ordinatio , distinctiones II-III, ed. by S. F. Brown, O. F. M., G. Gál, O. F. M., St. Bonaventure, New York 1970.

Hurtado de Mendoza, Petrus

Universa philosophia in unum corpus redacta , Lyons 1624.

Ioannes Capreolus

Defensiones theologiae divi Thomae Aquinatis , vol. 5, ed. by C. Paban, T. Pégues, Tours 1900-1908. URL: http://capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/CAPREOLUS/Capreolus_Defensiones_5.pdf

Ioannes Duns Scotus

, Quaestiones in Quartum Librum Sententiarum (dist. 43-48) , vol. 20, Editionova iuxta editionem Waddingi, Paris1894.

, Ordinatio. Liber Primus distinctio tertia , Editio Vaticana III, Civitas Vaticana 1954.

, Ordinatio. Liber Primus a distinctione vigesima sexta ad quadragesimam octavam , Editio Vaticana VI, Civitas Vaticana 1963.

, Ordinatio. Liber Secundus a distinctione prima ad tertiam , Editio Vaticana VII, Civitas Vaticana 1973.

, Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis , libri VI-IX, St. Bonaventure, N. Y 1997.

, Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima , ed. by B. C. Bazán et al.. (Opera Philosophica 5), Washington D C., St. Bonaventure, N. Y 2006.

Nicolaus Antonius Hispalensis

, Bibliotheca Hispana nova sive Hispanorum scriptorum qui ab anno MD. ad MDCLXXXIV floruere notitia , vol. 2, Madrid 1788.

Pasqualigo, Zaccaria

, Disputationes metaphysicae, pars secunda , Rome 1636.

Petrus Aureoli

, Commentariorum in secundum, tertium, quartum libros Sententiarum pars secunda II-IV Sent ., Rome1605.

Pomponazzi, Pietro

, Tractatus de immortalitate animae (Abhandlung tiber die Unsterblichkeit der Seele) , ed. by B. Mojsisch, Hamburg1990.

Poncius, Ioannes

, Integerphilosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti , prima pars complectens Logicam, Rome1642.

Porphyrius

, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Pars prima: Porphyrii Isagoge et in Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium , ed. by A. Busse, Berlin 1887.

Pavur, Claude, S. J..

, The Ratio Studiorum: The Official Plan for Jesuit Education , Saint Louis, Missouri2005.

Ribadeneira, Petrus

, Bibliotheca Scriptorum Societatis Iesu , ed. by P. Alegambe and N. Sotvell, Rome 1676.

Soto, Domingo

In Porphyrii Isagogen, Aristotelis Categorias, librosque de Demonstratione commentaria, Venice 1587 (reprint: Frankfurt 1967).

Spade, Paul Vincent

(ed. and transl.), Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham , Indianapolis, Indiana 1994.

Thomae de Sutton

De natura generis (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/xpg.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)

Thomas de Aquino

Summa Theologiae (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)

De ente et essentia (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)

Quaestio disputata de anima (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)

Quaestiones disputatae depotentia (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)

Summa contra Gentiles (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)

Quaestiones de quolibet (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona) Thomas de Vio Caietanus, Opuscula omnia, Lyons 1587 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 1995).

Summa totius theologiae S. Thomae de Aquino , pars prima, Venice 1588 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2000).

Vázquez, Gabriel

Commentaria ac disputationes in primam partem S. Thomae , t. 2, Ingolstadt 1609. URL: http://capricorn.bc.edu/siepm/DOCUMENTS/VAZQUEZ/In%20Primam%20II%20 1609.pdf

Secondary literature

Abercrombie, Nigel

1938, Saint Augustine and French Classical Thought ,Oxford 1938.

Abranches, Cassiano Dos Santos

1956, “A Teoria dos Universais em Pedro da Fonseca,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 12/3 (1956), 291-298.

Aho, Tuomo

2007, “Suárez on Cognitive Intentions, ” in: Mind, Cognition and Representation: the Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima , ed. by P. J. J. M. Bakker, J. M. M. H. Thijssen (Ashgate Studies in Medieval Philosophy), Aldershot, Hampshire2007, 179-203.

Åkerlund, Erik

2009, “Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6/2 (2009), 159-182.

Alcorta, José Ignacio

1949, La teoría de los modos en Suárez , Madrid 1949.

Alejandro, José M.

1948, La gnoseologia del Doctor Eximio y la acusación nominalista , Santander 1948.

Angelelli, Ignacio

1998, “Aristotelian-Scholastic Ontology and Predication in the Port-Royal Logic, ” Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 24 (1998), 283-310.

Ariew, Roger

1992, “Descartes and Scholasticism: the Intellectual Background to Descartes’ Thought, ” in: The Cambridge Companion to Descartes , ed. by J. Cottingham, Cambridge1992, 58-90.

1999, Descartes and the Last Scholastics , Ithaca, New York 1999.

Bak, Felix

1956, “Scoti schola numerosior est omnibus aliis simul sumptis,” Franciscan Studies 16 (1956), 144-165.

Bauer, Emmanuel J.

1996, Thomistische Metaphysik an der alten Benediktineruniversität Salzburg. Darstellung und Interpretation einer philosophischen Schule des 17./18. Jahrhunderts , Innsbruck/Wien 1996.

Beuchot, Mauricio H.

1989, “El problema de los universales en Juan de Santo Tomás,” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989), 33-42.

Bérubé, Camille

1964, La connaissance de l’individuel au moyen âge , Montréal/Paris 1964.

Blum, Paul Richard

1998, Philosophenphilosophie und Schulphilosophie: Typen des Philosophierens in der Neuzeit (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 27), Stuttgart 1998.

Boler, John F.

1982, “Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” in: The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy , ed. by N. Kretzman, A. Kenny and J. Pinborg, Cambridge 1982, 460-478.

Bolton, Martha B.

1998, “Universals, essences, and abstract Entities,” in: The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy , vol. 1, ed. by D. Garber, M. Ayers, Cambridge 1998, 178-211.

Bondi, Eugene

1966, “Predication: A Study Based in the Ars Logica of John of St. Thomas,” The Thomist 30 (1966), 260-294.

Borgo, Martha

2007, “Universals and the Trinity: Aquinas’s Commentary on Book I of Peter Lombard’s Sentences,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 315-342.

Broadie, Alexander

1985, The Circle of John Mair. Logic and Logicians in Pre-Reformation Scotland , Oxford 1985.

Buersmeyer, Keith

1987, “Aquinas on the 'modi significandi’,” The Modern Schoolman 64/2 (1987), 73-95.

Caruso, Ester

1979, Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza e la rinascita del nominalismo nella Scolastica del Seicento , Florence 1979.

Chabada, Michal

2005, Cognitio intuitiva et abstractiva. Die ontologischen Implikationen der Erkenntnislehre des Johannes Duns Scotus mit Gegentiberstellung zu Aristoteles und I. Kant (Veröffentlichungen der Johannes-Duns-Skotus-Akademie für Franziskanische Geistesgeschichte und Spiritualität Mönchengladbach, Bd. 18) Mönchengladbach 2005.

2007, Ján Duns Scotus. Vybrané kapitoly z jeho epistemológie a metafyziky , Bratislava 2007.

Costa, Francesco

1976, Ilp. Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M.Conv. (1603-1676). Il religioso, lo Scotista, lo scrittore , Rome 1976.

2006, “Dottrina immacolista del P. Bonaventura Belluto (1603-1676),” in: La Sicilia e l’immacolata. Non solo 150 anni , ed. by D. Ciccarelli, M. D. Valenza, Palermo 2006, 169-181.

Cresswell, John R.

1965, “Duns Scotus on the ’Common Nature’,” in: John Duns Scotus , 1265-1965, ed. by J. K. Ryan and B. M. Bonansea, Washington D C 1965, 122-132.

Cronin, Timothy J.

1966, Objective Being in Descartes and Suárez (Analecta Gregoriana 154), Rome 1966.

Cross, Richard

2002, “Gregory of Nyssa on Universals,” Vigiliae Christianae 56/4 (2002), 372-410.

2003a, “Divisibility, Communicability, and Predicability in Duns Scotus’s Theories of the Common Nature,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11/1 (2003), 43-63.

2003b, “Duns Scotus on Divine Substance and the Trinity,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11/2 (2003), 181-201.

2010, “Duns Scotus on the Semantic Content of Cognitive Acts and Species,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 10 (2010), 135-154.

Crowley, Bonaventure M.

1948, “The Life and Works of Bartholomew Mastrius, O. F. M. Conv. (1602-1673),” Franciscan Studies 8 (1948), 97-152.

Dalbiez, Roland

1929, “Les sources scolastiques de la théorie cartésienne de l’être objectif : A propos du « Descartes » de M. Gilson,” Revue d’Histoire de la Philosophie 3 (1929), 464-472.

Darós, William R.

1980, “Significado y conocimiento según Juan de Santo Tomás,” Rivista Rosmiana 74 (1980), 371-391.

Darge, Rolf

2004, Suúrez’ transzendentale Seinsauslegung und die Metaphysiktradition (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 80), Leiden/Boston 2004.

Deely, John N.

2008, Descartes & Poinsot. The Crossroads of Signs and Ideas , vol. 2 in the “Postmodernity in Philosophy” Poinsot Trilogy: Contrasting the Way of Signs to the Way of Ideas, Semiotics to Epistemology, Scranton/London 2008.

Degl' Innocenti, Umberto

1969, “Il principio d’individuazione dei corpi e Giovanni di S. Tommaso,” Aquinas 12 (1969), 59-99.

De Carvalho, Mário S.

2007, “The Coimbra Jesuits’ Doctrine on Universals (1577-1606),” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 531-543.

De Libera, Alain

1996, La querelle des universaux. De Platon á la fin du Moyen Âge , Paris 1996.

De Scorraille, Raoul

1911, François Suarez de la Compagnie de Jésus, d’après ses letters, ses autres écrits inédits et un grand nombre de documents nouveaux , 2 vols., Paris 1911.

De Vries, Josef

1949, “Die Erkenntnislehre des Franz Suárez und der Nominalismus,” Scholastik 20-24 (1949), 321-349.

Di Liso, Saverio

2000, Domingo de Soto: dalla logica alla scienza , Bari 2000.

Di Vona, Piero

1994, I concetti trascendenti in Sebastián Izquierdo e nella Scolastica del Seicento (Libertà della mente 3), Naples 1994.

Doyle, John P.

1984, “Prolegomena to a Study of Extrinsic Denomination in the Work of Francis Suarez, S. J.,” Vivarium 22/2 (1984), 121-160.

1987, “Suarez on Truth and Mind-Dependent Beings: Implication for a Unified Semiotic,” in: Semiotics 1983 , ed. by J. Evans and J. N. Deely, New York 1987, 121-133.

1994, “Poinsot on the Knowability of Beings of Reason,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68/3 (1994), 337-362.

2010, “Francisco Suárez on the Interpretation of Laws,” in: Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, S. J. (1548-1617) , ed. by V. M. Salas, Leuven 2010, 357-387.

Emery, Gilles

1993, “Bref catalogue des oeuvres de saint Thomas,” in: Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin. Sa personne et son oeuvre , J.-P. Torrell, Paris 1993, 483-525.

Fichter, Joseph H.

1940, Man of Spain. Francis Suarez , New York 1940.

Forlivesi, Marco

1994, “Le edizioni del ’Cursus theologicus’ di Joannes a S. Thoma,” Divus Thomas 97/3 (1994), 9-56.

2000, “Materiali per una descrizione della disputa e dell’esame di laurea in età moderna,” in: Dalla prima alla seconda Scolastica. Paradigmi e percorsi storiografici , ed. by A. Ghisalberti (Philosophia - Studio Domenicano 28), Bologna2000, 252-279.

2002a, “La distinction entre concept formel et concept objectif: Suárez, Pasqualigo, Mastri,” Les Études philosophiques 1 (2002), 3-30.

2002b, Scotistarum princeps. Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) e il suo tempo (Fonti e studi francescani 11), Padua2002.

2006a, “A Man, an Age, a Book,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , atti del Convegno di studi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673), Meldola - Bertinoro, 20-22 settembre 2002, ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 23-144.

2006b, “The Nature of Transcendental Being and Its Contraction to Its Inferiors in the Thought of Mastri and Belluto,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi, Padua2006, 261-337.

2008, “C’è una filosofia nell’opera di Francisco Suàrez? Il caso della dottrina sul ‘verbum mentis’ tra ‘auctoritates’ e argomenti di ragione,” Rinascimento 48 (2008), 397-450.

Fraile, Guillermo

1978, Historia de la filosofia III. Del humanismo a la ilustración (siglos XV-XVIII ) (Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos), Madrid 1978.

Freddoso, Alfred J.

1984, “Review of Suarez on lndividuation, Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and its Principle, transl. with an introd. and glossary by Jorge J. E. Gracia, Milwaukee 1982,“ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (1984), 419-421. URL: http://www.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/gracia.htm.

Fuetscher, Lorenz

1933, Akt und Potenz, Eine kritisch-systematische Auseinandersetzung mit dem neueren Thomismus , Innsbruck1933.

Furton, Edward J.

1997, “The Constitution of the Object in Immanuel Kant and John Poinsot,” The Review of Metaphysics 51/1 (1997), 55-75.

Galluzzo, Gabrielle

2003, “Met. Z ₁₃ in the Contemporary Debate and in Aquinas’s Interpretation,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 14 (2003), 159-226.

2004, “Aquinas on Common Nature and Universals,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 71/1 (2004), 131-171.

2008, “The Problem of Universals and Its History. Some General Considerations,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 19 (2008), 335-369.

2011, “Two senses of Universal. Avicenna’s Doctrine of Essence and Aquinas’s View on Individuation,” in: The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics , ed. by D. N. Hasse, A. Bertolacci (Scientia Graeco-Arabica 7), Berlin, Boston 2011, 309-338.

Ghisalberti, Alessandro

2006, “Mastri e la storia della filosofia medievale,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 145-149.

Giacon, Carlo

1941, Guglielmo di Occam: saggio storico-critico sulla formazione e sulla decadenza della Scolastica , Milan 1941.

1946, La Seconda Scolastica, Vol. II: Precedenze teoretiche ai problemi giuridici. Toledo, Pereira, Fonseca, Molina, Suarez , Milan 1946.

Gilson, Étienne

1959, Johannes Duns Scotus. Einführung in die Grundgedanken seiner Lehre , Dusseldorf 1959.

Goris, Wouter

2009, “Padua 1500 - The Medieval Debate on the First Known Revisited,” in: Der Aristotelismus an den Europäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit , ed. by R. Darge, E. J. Bauer, G. Frank, Stuttgart2009, 83-98.

Gracia, Jorge J. E.

1991, “Suarez’s Conception of Metaphysics: A Step in the Direction of Mentalism?,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65/3 (1991), 287-309.

1992, Philosophy and Its History: Issues in Philosophical Historiography (SUNY Series in Philosophy) Albany, N. Y 1992.

1993, “Suárez and Metaphysical Mentalism: The Last Visit,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/3 (1993), 349-354.

1994, “Cutting the Gordian Knot of Ontology: Thomas’s Solution to the Problem of Universals,” in: Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy , ed. by D. M. Gallagher (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy Series 28), Washington D C 1994, 16-36.

Grajewski, Maurice J.

1944, The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus. A Study in Metaphysics , Washington D C 1944.

1946, “John Ponce, Franciscan Scotist of the Seventeenth Century,” Franciscan Studies 6 (1946), 54-92.

Gredt, Joseph

1961, Elementa Philosophiae Aristotelico-Thomisticae , 2 vols., Barcelona/Freiburg in Breisgau/Rome/New York 1961.

Guil, Blanes F.

1956, “Las raices de la doctrina de Juan de santo Tomás acerca del universal lógico,” Estudios filosóficos 5 (1956), 215-232.

Hattab, Helen

2009, Descartes on Forms and Mechanicism , Cambridge/New York 2009.

Heider, Daniel

2008, “Suárez on Material Substance. Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites,” Organon F 15/4 (2008), 423-438.

2009, Kdo byl Frantisek Suárez? Život a dílo “Vynikajícího doktora” (Studijní texty, XLIII) Olomouc 2009.

2010a, “Metaphysics of Universals in John Poinsot’s Material Logic,” in: Thomas Aquinas and Thomism Today , ed. by H. K. Bulscú, Budapest 2010, 151-162.

2010b, “Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza’s (Mis)interpretation of Aquinas,” in: Francisco Suárez and his Legacy. The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy , ed. by M. Sgarbi (Metafisica e storia della metafisica 35), Milan 2010, 105-140.

2010c, “Bartholomew Mastrius (1602-1673) and John Punch (1599 or 1603-1661) on the Common Nature and Universal Unity,” in: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, vol. 84: Philosophy and Language>, ed. by R. E. Houser, T. Osborne (2010), 145-166.

2011a, “K objektivnímu bytí u Suáreze. Poznámka ke studii Jana Palkosky ‘Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu’,” Studia Neoaristotelica 8/1 (2011), 95-105.

2011b, “Suárezova teorie poznání a její vztah k tomismu,” Filosofický časopis 59/6 (2011), 865-896.

2011c, “Reifikace hylemorfických principů, substanciální jednota člověka a nesmrtelnost lidské duše ve filosofii F. Suáreze,” in: Pojetí člověka v dějinách a současnosti filosofie , ed. By T. Nejeschleba, V. Němec, M. Recinová, Brno 2011, 139-152.

2011d, Suárez a jeho metafyzika. Od pojmu jsoucna přes transcendentální jednotu k druhům transcendentální jednoty , Praha2011.

2011e, “The Role of Trinitarian Theology in Universals. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673) and Bonaventura Belluto (1600-1676),” in: Herausforderung durch Religion? Begegnungen der Philosophie mit Religionen in Mittelalter und Renaissance , ed. by G. Krieger, Würzburg 2011, 268-284.

2012a, “John Poinsot (1589-1644) on the Universale Materialiter Sumptum: A Dual View-point,” The Modern Schoolman 89/1-2, Special Issue: “The Variety of Second Scholasticism”, ed. by D. Heider (2012), 47-63.

2012b, "Suárez and Javellus on Transcendentals and Divisions of Being,” in: Proceedings of 12th SIEPM-Congress “Universality of Reason - Plurality of Philosophies in the Middle Ages ”, ed. by A. Musco et al.., Palermo 2012, 849-859.

2012c, “Úvod do problematiky univerzálií v první a druhé scholastice,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 11-31.

2012d, “Teorie společné přirozenosti a esence ve druhé scholastice,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 208-233.

Heider, Daniel, et al.

(2012e, “Filip Fabri OFM Conv. († 1630) o společné přirozenosti ve Philosophia naturalis (1602) a kritická odpověd’ Bartoloměje Mastria OFM Conv. († 1673),” in: Františkánský kontext teologického a filosofického myšleni , ed. by P. Hlavácek, Europeana Pragensia 4 - Historia Franciscana 4), Praha 2012, 114-129.

Heider, Daniel

2013, “Abstraction, Intentionality, & Moderate Realism. The Ontology & Epistemology of Universals in Francisco Suárez & John Poinsot,” in: Hircocervi & Other Metaphysical Wonders . Essays in Honor of John P. Doyle (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 84) , ed. by V. M. Salas, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2013, 177-211.

Hernández, Miguel C.

1949, “La intencionalidad en la Filosofía de Franciso Suárez,” in: Actas del Congreso International de filosofia Barcelona 1948 , Madrid 1949, 315-337.

Hickman, Larry

1980, Modern Theories of Higher Level Predicates: Second Intentions in the Neuzeit , München1980.

Hoeres, Walter

1961, “Bewusstsein und Erkenntnisbild bei Suárez,” Scholastik 36 (1961), 192-216.

Honnefelder, Ludger

1984, “Natura communis,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 6, ed. by J. Ritter and K. Grunder, Basel1984, 494-504.

Heider, Daniel

1990, Scientia transcendens. Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit , Hamburg1990.

Hull, Gordon

2006, “Hobbes’s Radical Nominalism,” Epoché 11/1 (2006), 201-223.

Jansen, Bernhard

1936, “Zur Philosophie der Scotisten des 17. Jahrhunderts,” Franziskanische Studien 17 (1936), 150-175.

2004, Jezuité v přírodnich vědách a ve filosofii 17. a 18. století , Olomouc2004.

King, Peter

1992, “Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and the Individual Differentia,” Philosophical Topics 20/2 (1992), 50-76.

2005, “Duns Scotus on Singular Essences,” Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 30 (2005), 111-137.

Klima, Gyula

2003, “Natures: the Problem of Universals,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy , ed. by A. S. McGrade, Cambridge2003, 196-207.

Knebel, Sven K.

1999, “The Early Modern Rollback of Merely Extrinsic Denomination,” in: Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy , ed. by S. F. Brown, acts of the international colloquium held at Boston College June 14-16 1996 (Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 7), Turnhout1999, 317-331.

2001a, “Verworrenheit I,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 11, ed. by J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel, Basel2001, 1014-1017.

2001b, “Universalien, I. Antike; Mittelalter,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 11, ed. by J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel, Basel 2001, 179-187.

2011, Suarezismus. Erkenntnistheoretisches aus dem Nachlass des Jesuitengenerals Tirso González de Santalla (1624-1705) , Abhandlung und Edition (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 51), Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2011.

Kobusch, Theo

1987, Sein und Sprache. Historische Grundlegung einer Ontologie der Sprache (Studien zur Problemgeschichte der antiken und mittelalterlichen Philosophie 11), Leiden/ New York/Copenhagen/Cologne 1987.

Koláček, Josef

2006, “Ratio studiorum. Geneze - struktura - hlavní cíle,” Studia Comeniana et historica 75-76 (2006), 19-31.

Kraml, Hans

1995, “Beobachtungen zum Ursprung der ‘distinctio formalis’,” in: Via Scoti. Methodologica ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti , atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale, Roma9-11. Marzo 1993, vol. 1, ed. by L. Sileo, Rome 1995, 305-318.

Kraus, Johannes

1927, Die Lehre des Johannes Duns Skotus O. F. M. von der Natura communis. Ein Beitrag zum Universalienproblem in der Scholastik (Studia Friburgensia), Freiburg (Schweiz) 1927.

Lalla, Sebastian

2010, “Die Interpretation von ‘De anima’ bei Francisco Suárez,” in: Der Aristotelismus an den Europäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit , ed. by R. Darge, E. J. Bauer, G. Frank, Stuttgart2010, 235-248.

Lechner, Matthias

1911, Die Erkenntnislehre des Suárez , Fulda 1911.

Leinsle, Ulrich G.

2006, Dilinganae Disputationes. Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen 1555-1648 , Regensburg 2006.

Ludwig, Joseph

1929, Das akausale Zusammenwirken (sympathia) der Seelenvermögen in der Erkenntnislehre des Suarez , München 1929.

Madeira, João

2006, Pedro da Fonseca's “Isagoge Philosophica” and the Predicables from Boethius to the Lovanienses , doctoral thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven 2006 URL: [https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/1979/409/5/thesis-docto.pdf].

Mahieu, León

1921, François Suarez, sa philosophie et les rapports qu’elle a avec sa théologie , Paris1921.

Manser, Gallus M.

1934, “Die Universalienlehre im Lichte von Akt und Potenz,” Divus Thomas 12 (1934), 385-407.

Maritain, Jacques

1937, The Degrees of Knowledge , transl. by B. Wall and M. R. Adamson, London1937.

Marrone, Francesco

2008, “Descartes e la tradizione scotista. Gli antecedenti storici della nozione di realitas obiectiva,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 279-302.

Martins, António M.

2006, “The Conimbricenses,” in: Intellect et imagination dans la Philosophie Médiévale , actes du XI Congrés International de Philosophie Médiévale de la S.I.E.P.M. (Porto, du 26 au 31 août 2002), ed. by M. C. Pacheco, J. Meirinhos, Turnhout 2006, 101-117.

Meier-Oeser, Stephan

1997, Die Spur des Zeichens. Das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit , Berlin/New York 1997.

Menn, Stephen

1997, “Suárez, Nominalism, and Modes,” in: Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery , ed. by K. White (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 29), Washington D C 1997, 226-256.

Mertz, Donald W.

2004, “The Nature and Necessity of Composite Simples, e.g., Ontic Predicates,” Metaphysica. International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics 5/1 (2004), 89-133. URL: http://www.metaphysica.de/texte/mp2004_1-Mertz.pdf

Millett, Benignus

1968, “Irish Scotists at St. Isidore’s College, Rome, in the Seventeenth Century,” in: De doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti , vol. IV: Scotismus decursu saeculorum, Rome1968, 399-419.

Minges, Parthenius

1930, Ioannis Duns Scoti doctrina philosophica et theologica quoad res praecipuas proposita et exposita , vol. I: Doctrina philosophica, Theologia fundamentalis, Rome 1930, 67-106.

Montanari, Antonio

1883, Gli uomini illustri di Faenza , Faenza 1883.

Mooney, Canice

1958, “The Writings of Father Luke Wadding, O. F. M.,” Franciscan Studies 18/3-4 (1958), 225-239.

Müller, Hermann J.

1968, Die Lehre vom verbum mentis in der spanischen Scholastik. Untersuchungen zur historischen Entwicklung und zum Verständnis dieser Lehre bei Toletus, den Conimbricensern und Suarez , Münster1968.

Norena, Carlos P.

1981, “Ockham and Suárez on the Ontological Status of Universal Concepts,” The New Scholasticism 55/3 (1981), 348-362.

Novák, Lukás

2006, “Scoti de conceptu entis doctrina a Mastrio retractata et contra Poncium propugnata,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 237-259.

2012, “Ponciova syntéza ultrarealismu s nominalismem na pozadí barokně-scotistické teorie obecnin,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budéjovice 2012, 234-257.

Novák, Lukáš, Dvořák, Petr

2007, Úvod do logiky aristotelské tradice , České Budějovice 2007.

Novotný, Daniel D.

2008, “Forty-Two Years after Suárez. Mastri and Belluto’s Development of the Classical’ Theory of Entia Rationis” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 473-498.

2009, “In Defense of Baroque Scholasticism,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6/2 (2009), 209-233.

2012, “Teorie obecnin Sebastiana Izquierda (1601-1681),” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budéjovice 2012, 258-280.

O’Brien, Andrew J.

1964, “Scotus on Essence and Existence,” The New Scholasticism 38/1 (1964), 61-77.

Owens, Joseph

1957, “The number of Terms in the Suarezian Discussion on Essence and Being,” The Modern Schoolman 34/3 (1957), 147-191.

1971, “Common nature: A point of comparison between Thomistic and Scotistic metaphysics,” in: Inquiries into Medieval Philosophy. A Collection in Honor of Francis P. Clarke , ed. by J. F. Ross (Contributions in Philosophy 4), Greenwood, Westport 1971, 185-209.

Pasnau, Robert

1998, “Aquinas and the Content Fallacy,” The Modern Schoolman 75/4 (1998), 293-314.

2003, “Cognition,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus , ed. by T. Williams, Cambridge2003, 285-311.

Peccorini, Francisco L.

1972, “Suárez’s Struggle with the Problem of the One and the Many,” The Thomist 36 (1972), 433-471.

1974, “Knowledge of the Singular: Aquinas, Suárez and Recent Interpreters,” The Thomist 38 (1974), 605-655.

Pereira, José

2007, Suárez. Between Scholasticism & Modernity (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 52), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2007.

Perler, Dominik

2002, Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter , Frankfurt am Main 2002.

Peroutka, David

2010, “Imagination, Intellect and Premotion. A Psychological Theory of Domingo Báñez,” Studia Neoaristotelica 7/2 (2010), 107-115.

2012, “Sémantika abstraktnich pojmů v tomismu druhé scholastiky,” Studia Neoaristotelica, Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice , ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 193-207.

Pessin, Andrew

2008, “Descartes’ Theory of Ideas,” in: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Fall 2008 Edition. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/descartes-ideas/

Pich, Roberto Hofmeister

2012, “Alfonso Briceño (1587-1668) and the Controversiae on John Duns Scotus‘s Philosophical Theology: The Case of Infinity,” The Modern Schoolman 89/1-2, Special Issue: “The Variety of Second Scholasticism,” ed. by D. Heider 2012, 65-94.

Pinborg, Jan 1974, “Zum Begriff der ‘Intentio Secunda’. Radulphus Brito, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli in Diskussion,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin 13 (1974), 49-59.

Pini, Giorgio

2002, Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus. An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Categories in the late thirteenth century (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 77), Leiden/Boston/Cologne 2002.

2004, “Absoluta consideratio naturae: Tommaso d’Aquino e la dottrina avicenniana dell’ essenza,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004), 387-438.

2007, “Scotus on Universals: A Reconsideration,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 395-409.

Poppi, Antonio

1966, “Il contributo dei formalisti padovani al problema delle distinzioni,” in: Problemi e figure della scuola scotista del Santo , ed. by A. Poppi (Pubblicazioni della Provincia dei Frati minori conventuali 5), Padua 1966, 601-790.

Rasmussen, Douglas B.

1994, “The Significance for Cognitive Realism of the Thought of John Poinsot,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68/3 (1994), 409-424.

Renemann, Michael

2006, “Mastri on ‘praecisio obiectiva’,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sulpensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 399-414.

2010a, “The Mind’s Focus as an Efficient Cause: Francisco Suárez’s Re-interpretation of the Traditional Understanding of the Idea,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84/4 (2010), 693-710.

2010b, Gedanken als Wirkursachen. Francisco Suárez zur geistigen Hervorbringung (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 49), Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2010.

Rinaldi, Teresa

1998, Francisco Suarez. Cognitio singularis materialis: De anima (Vestigia 16), Bari1998.

Risse, Wilhelm

1964, Die Logik der Neuzeit , Bd. 1: 1500-1640, Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt 1964.

Rivera de Ventosa, Enrique

1982, “Significación de Juan de S. Tomás en la historia del pensamiento,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 38/4 (1982), 581-592.

Roig Gironella, Juan

1961, “Para la historia del nominalismo y de la reacción antinominalista de Suárez,” Pensamiento: Revista de investigación e informatión filosófica 17 (1961), 279-310.

Ross, James F.

1962, “Suarez on ‘Universals’,” The Journal of Philosophy 59/23 (1962), 736-748.

Rozemond, Marleen

2012, “Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez’s Soul,” in: The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez , ed. by B. Hill & H. Lagerlund, Oxford/New York 2012, 154-172.

Rozwadowski, Aleksander

1937, “De fundamento metaphysico nostrae cognitionis universalis secundum D. Thomam,” in: Acta Pont. Academiae Romanae S. Thomae Aquinatis et Religionis Catholicae , vol. III, Rome 1937, 103-112.

Saxlová, Tereza

1997, “Povaha obecného pojmu u Viléma Ockhama. Od teorie představy (fictum) k teorii rozumového aktu (intellectio),” Filosofický časopis 45/2 (1997), 179-203.

Scapin, Pietro

1976, La metafisica scotista a Padova dal XV al XVII secolo , in: Storia e cultura al Santo , ed. by A. Poppi (Fonti e studi per la storia del Santo di Padova, vol. III, 1), Vicenza 1976, 485-538.

Schmitt, Charles B.

1979, “Filippo Fabri’s ‘Philosophia Naturalis Io. Duns Scoti’ and its Relation to Paduan Aristotelianism,” in: La tradizione scotista veneto-padovana , ed. by C. Bérubé, Padua 1979, 305-312.

Schmutz, Jacob

Scholasticon , URL: http://www.scholasticon.fr

2002, “L’héritage des Subtils. Cartographie du Scotisme de l’âge classique,” Les études philosophiques 1 (2002), 51-81.

2007, “Hurtado et son double. La querelle sur les images mentales dans la scholastique moderne,” in: Questions sur l’intentionnalité , ed. by L. Couloubaritsis, A. Mazzú (Recueil, n°17), Brussels2007, 157-232.

2008, “Le petit scotisme du Grand Siécle. Etude doctrinale et documentaire sur la philosophie au Grand Couvent des Cordeliers de Paris, 1517-1771,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 365-472.

Schobinger, Jean-Pierre

(ed) 1998, Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, Bd. 1: Allgemeine Themen. Iberische Halbinsel. Italien (Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie), Basel1998.

Secada, Jorge

2012, “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations,” in: InterpretingSuárez. Critical Essays , ed. by D. Schwartz, Cambridge/New York 2012, 62-88.

Sladeczek, Franz M.

1926, “Die intellektuelle Erfassung der sinnfälligen Einzeldinge nach der Lehre des hl. Thomas von Aquin,” Scholastik 1/2 (1926), 184-215.

Sousedík, Stanislav

1983, Valerián Magni (1586-1661). Kapitola z kulturních dějin Čech 17. stoleti , Praha 1983.

1998, “Arriagas Universalienlehre,” in: Rodrigo de Arriaga (†1667). Philosoph und Theologe , ed. by T. Saxlová and S. Sousedík, Praha 1998, 41-49.

2004, “Pomyslná jsoucna (entia rationis) v aristotelské tradici 17. století,” Filosofický časopis 52/4 (2004), 533-544.

2005, “Filosofické dílo pražského františkána Bernarda Sanniga OFM (†1704),” in: Historia Franciscana II , ed. by P. R. Beneš, P. Hlaváček, Kostelni Vydří 2005, 151-163.

2006, Identitni teorie predikace , Praha 2006.

2009, Philosophie der frühen Neuzeit in den böhmischen Ländern , Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt 2009.

South, James B.

2001a, “Suárez and the Problem of External Sensation,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10/2 (2001), 217-240.

2001b, “Francisco Suárez on Imagination,” Vivarium 39/1 (2001), 119-158.

2002, “Singular and Universal in Suárez’s Account of Cognition,” Review of Metaphysics 55/4 (2002), 785-823.

2012, “Suárez, Immortality, and the Soul’s Dependence on the Body," in: The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez , ed. by B. Hill, H. Lagerlund, Oxford/New York 2012, 121-136.

Spruit, Leen

1995, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. II: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of the Intelligibile Species in Modern Philosophy (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 49), Leiden/New York/Cologne 1995.

2008, “Renaissance Views of Active Perception,” in: Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy , ed. by S. Knuuttila, P. Kärkkäinen (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 6), Dordrecht 2008, 203-224.

Stone, Martin W. F.

2009, “Punch’s Riposte: The Irish Contribution to Early Modern Scotism from Maurice O’Fihely O. F. M. Conv. to Anthony Rourke O. F. M. Obs.,” in: The Irish Contribution to European Scholastic Thought , ed. by J. McEvoy, M. Dunne, Dublin 2009, 137-191.

Svoboda, David

2012a, “Absolutně uvažovaná přirozenost. Petr Fonseca a jeho významní středověcí předchůdci,” Studia theologica 50/4 (2012), 102-126.

2012b, “Koncepce univerzálií Dominika de Soto O. P.,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 172-192.

2012c, Metafyzické myšlení Tomáse Akvinského , Praha 2012.

2012d, “The Ratio of Unity: Positive or Negative? The case of Thomas Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86/1 (2012), 47-70.

Teixidor, Alois

1912, “De universalibus iuxta Doctorem Eximium Franciscum Suarez,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 25/4 (1912), 445-461.

Tropia, Anna

2010, “Suárez as a Scotist: the Portrait of the Doctor Eximius in Losada’s Commentary on the Soul,” in: Francisco Suárez and his Legacy. The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy , ed. by M. Sgarbi (Metafisica e storia della metafisica 35), Milan 2010, 89-101.

Tyn, Thomas M.

1988, “L’essere nel pensiero di Giovanni di San Tommaso O. P.,” in: Giovanni di San Tommaso nel IV centenario della sua nascita (1589). Il suo pensiero filosofico, teologico e mistico - atti del convegno di studio della Societá Internazionale S. Tommaso d’Aquino (SITA)>, Roma 25-28 novembre 1988, Rome 1988, 21-55.

Tweedale, Martin M.

1984, “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Views on Universals,” Phronesis 29/3 (1984), 279-303.

1999a, Scotus vs. Ockham - A Medieval Dispute over Universals. Vol. II: Commentary (Studies in the History of Philosophy, volume 50 B), Lewiston, N. Y 1999.

1999b, “Locke on Universals: the Fruit of Ockham’s Dilemma?,” in: Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy, acts of the international colloquium held at Boston College June 14-16 1996, ed. by S. F. Brown (Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 7), Turnhout1999, 235-244.

Uedelhofen, Matthias

1916, Die Logik Petrus Fonsecas , Bonn 1916.

Van der Lecq, Ria

2000, “Domingo de Soto on Universals and the Ontology of Intentions,” in: Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain, acts of the 12th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, held at the University of Navarre (Pamplona, 26-30 May 1997), ed. by I. Angelleli, P. Pérez-Ilzarbe (Philosophische Texte und Studien 54), Hildesheim 2000, 309-325.

Wells, Norman J.

1962, “Suarez, Historian and Critic of the Modal Distinction between Essential Being and Existential Being,” The New Scholasticism 36/4 (1962), 419-444.

1993a, “Descartes’ Idea and Its Sources,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/4 (1993), 513-535.

1993b, “Esse Cognitum and Suárez Revisited,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/3 (1993), 339-348.

2007, “Mastrius on Esse Cognitum ,” in: Laudemus viros gloriosos : Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, CSB., ed. by R. E. Houser (Thomistic Studies), Notre Dame, Indiana 2007, 327-361.

Winance, Eleuthére

1985, “Echo de la querelle du psychologisme et de l’antipsychologisme dans l Ars Logica de Jean Poinsot,” Semiotica 56-3/4 (1985), 225-259.

Wippel, John F.

2000, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas. From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Monographs of the Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy 1), Washington D C 2000.

Wöhler, Hans-Ulrich

, ed 1992, Texte zum Universalienstreit. Vom Ausgang der Antike bis zur Frühscholastik , Bd. 1, Berlin1992.

Wolter, Allan B.

1946, The Transcendentals and their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus (Franciscan Institute Publications, Philosophy Series 3), Washington D C 1946.

Subjects

Philosophy

BIC Subject: HPCB – Western philosophy: Medieval & Renaissance, c 500 to c 1600

BISAC Subject: PHI016000 – PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern

U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2013043334 | Marc record