Universals in Second Scholasticism

A comparative study with focus on the theories of Francisco Suárez S.J. (1548-1617), João Poinsot O.P. (1589-1644) and Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O.F.M. Conv. (1602-1673)/Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M. Conv. (1600-1676)

| Faculty of Theology, University of South Bohemia, Institute of Philosophy, The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
ISBN 9789027214645 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027270672 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
This study aims to present a comparative analysis of philosophical theories of universals espoused by the foremost representatives of the three main schools of early modern scholastic thought. The book introduces the doctrines of Francisco Suárez, S.J. (1548–1617), the Thomist John of St. Thomas, O.P. (1589–1644), and the Scotists Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola, O.F.M. Conv. (1602–1673) and Bonaventura Belluto, O.F.M. Conv. (1600–1676). The author examines in detail their mutual doctrinal delineation as well as the conceptualist tenet of the Jesuit Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza (1578–1641), whose thought constitutes an important systematic point of comparison especially with Suárez’s doctrine. The book offers the first comparative elaboration of the issue of universals, in both its metaphysical and its epistemological aspects, in the era of second scholasticism.
[Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, 54]  2014.  xi, 344 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) on universals
3. João Poinsot (1589–1644) on universals
4. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602–1673)/Bonaventura Belluto (1600–1676) on universals
5. Concluding comparison and evaluation
Appendix: Bio-bibliographies
Index of names
Subject index
“Die vorliegende Arbeit ist ein überaus wichtiger Beitrag zu diesem Gebiet. Sie leistet die Untersuchung der Universalienlehre zudem nicht an einem einzelnen Autor, sondern in komparatistischer Weise im Vergleich der wichtigsten Autoren der Jesuiten (Suárez), der dominikanischen Thomisten (Poinsot/Johannes a S. Thoma) und der franziskanischen Skotisten (Mastri/Belluto). […] Die methodische und quellenmäßige Durchführung der Arbeit kann uneingeschränkt als exzellent eingestuft werden. Mit größtmöglicher Klarheit werden die einzelnen Positionen und Argumente Schritt für Schritt entfaltet und beleuchtet, historisch eingeordnet und in ihrer Valenz bewertet.”
“Daniel Heider´s book on the universals in three major representatives of the so-called Second Scholasticism is a detailed examination based on close reading of the relevant primary sources and gives access to the debate as it was lead among the philosophers of the 17th century. It proves the author's intimate familiarity with the issues and his mastery of the philosophical questions. […] Heider proves himself to be an outstanding scholar and specialist of the 17th century school philosophy and of present-day epistemology.”
“The great strength of this book is Heider's masterful, detailed examination of three representative accounts from sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Scholasticism. Suárez offers an orginal blend of Thomist, Scotist and nominalist elements; Poinsot's account is more purely ad mentem Thomi, while Mastri and Belluto take an approach ad mentem Scoti. Of course, there were other streams of thought in the period, but Heider reasonably takes these to be the most important ones. In addition to a familiarity with the primary texts that few could rival, he has an exemplary command of the secondary literature. A key benefit of this erudition is that his analysis is not limited to the narrow ontological problem of universals, but also encompasses the psychological questions about the processes of cognition and the formation of universal concepts.”
“The debate on universals is, generally speaking, a well-known subject in the history of philosophy, but views on universals from the end of the sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth century—the object of Heider’s welcome contribution—are quite neglected. [...] The virtue of the book, no doubt a reference for research on the subject, lies in painstakingly following the full complexities of the debate being analyzed. It is also successful in approaching the subject in a comparative way (Heider’s comparisons extend, in fact, to many more authors than the three main ones structuring the volume). In this way, and not insignificantly, the author conveys the eminently dialogical way in which Second Scholastic positions developed through reacting to one another.”
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Metaphysik im Barockscotismus [Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, 57], Crossref logo
Ballor, Jordan J.
2017.  In Aquinas Among the Protestants,  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Forlivesi, Marco
2014.  In Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Guzzardi, Luca
2020.  In Ruggiero Boscovich’s Theory of Natural Philosophy [Science Networks. Historical Studies, 60],  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
Hanke, Miroslav
2019. Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 40:4  pp. 355 ff. Crossref logo
Perler, Dominik
2020. Can We Know Substances? Suárez on a Sceptical Puzzle. Theoria Crossref logo
Salas, Victor
2019. Rodrigo de Arriaga, S. J. (1592--1667) on Analogy and the Concept of Being. Res Philosophica 96:1  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Salas, Victor M.
2014.  In Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Primary literature (including English translations)

Francisco Suárez

Opera omnia
(28 vols.), ed. by C. Berton, Paris 1856-78.Google Scholar
Disputationes metaphysicae
, vols. 25/26, Paris 1866 (reprint: Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Commentaria ac disputationes in tertiam partem D. Thomae tomus tertius
, tomus vigesimus, Paris 1860.Google Scholar
Commentaria ac disputationes in primampartem D. Thomae De Deo uno et trino
, tomus primus, Paris 1856.Google Scholar
Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis “De anima
”, ed. by Salvador Castellote Cubells, 3 vols., Madrid 1992 URL: http://​www​.salvadorcastellote​.com​/investigacion​.htmGoogle Scholar

English translations

Doyle, John P.
1995, On Beings of Reason. Metaphysical Disputation LIV , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 33), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1995.Google Scholar
2004, A Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Index locupletissimus in Metaphysicam Aristotelis) , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 40), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2004.Google Scholar
2006, On Real Relation. Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John P. Doyle (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 42), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2006.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E.
1982, Francis Suarez on Individuation: Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and Its Principle , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Jorge J. E. Gracia (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 23), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1982.Google Scholar
Kronen, John D., Reedy, Jeremiah D.
2000, On the Formal Cause of Substance. Metaphysical Disputation XV , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by John D. Kronen and Jeremiah D. Reedy (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 36), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2000.Google Scholar
Ross, James F.
1964, On Formal and Universal Unity. Metaphysical Disputation VI , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by James F. Ross (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 15), Milwaukee, Wisconsion 1964.Google Scholar
Vollert, Cyril, S. J.
1947, On the Various Kinds of Distinctions. Metaphysical Disputation VII , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Cyril Vollert (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 4), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1947.Google Scholar
Wells, Norman, J.
1983, On the Essence of Finite Being as Such, on the Existence of that Essence and Their Distinction. Metaphysical disputation XXXI , transl. and with an introd. by N. J. Wells (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 24), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1983.Google Scholar

João Poinsot (Ioannes a S. Thoma)

Cursus theologicus in Summam theologicam d. Thomae
(10 vols.), Paris 1883-86.Google Scholar
Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus
(3 vols.), Turin 1948-50 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 2008).Google Scholar

English translations

Deely, John N.
1985, Tractatus de signis. The Semiotic of John Poinsot , interpretative arrangement by J. Deely, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1985.Google Scholar
Glanville, John J., G. D. Hollenhorst, Y. R. M. Simon
1949, “Entia Rationis and Second Intentions by John of St. Thomas,” The New Scholasticism 23/4 (1949), 395-413.Google Scholar
Simon, Yves René M., J. J. Glanville, G. D. Hollenhorst
1955, The Material Logic of John of St. Thomas. Basic Treatises , Chicago, London 1955.Google Scholar
Wade, Francis C.
Outlines of Formal Logic , transl. from the Latin with an introd. and notes by Francis C. Wade (Mediaeval Philosophical Texts in Translation 8), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1955.
Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola/Bonaventura Belluto Philosophiae ad mentem Scoti cursus integer (5 vols.), Venice 1727.

Other authors

, Metaphysics , Books 1-9, transl. by H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1933.Google Scholar
, On the Soul , with an English transl. by W. S. Hett, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1936.Google Scholar
, On Interpretation , ed. and transl. by H. P. Cooke and H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1938.Google Scholar
, Categories , ed. and transl. by H. P. Cooke, H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London 1938.Google Scholar
, Posterior Analytics , ed. and transl. by H. Tredennick, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London1960.Google Scholar
, The Complete Works of Aristotle , ed. by J. Barnes, transl. by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, Princeton 1995.Google Scholar
, Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina V-X, ed. by S. Van Riet, Louvain/ Leiden 1980.Google Scholar
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus
, In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta , ed. by S. Brandt, Vienna/ Leipzig 1906.Google Scholar
Complutenses Discalceati,
Disputationes in Aristotelis dialecticam , Lyons 1668 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 1977).Google Scholar
Carleton, Thomas Compton
Philosophia universa , Antwerp 1649.
Collegium Conimbricense
Fabri, Filippo
Philosophia naturalis Ioan. Duns Scoti ex quattuor libris Sententiarum et Quodli-betis collecta , Venice 1622.
Fonseca, Petrus
Commentaria in libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis (4 vols.), Cologne 1615. URL: http://​capricorn​.bc​.edu​/siepm​/DOCUMENTS​/FONSECA​/FONSECA%20Metaphysica%20vol​.%203​.pdf
Franciscus Toletus
Opera omnia philosophica I-III , Cologne 1615-1616 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zurich/New York 1985).
Frassen, Claude
Philosophia academica , Venice 1767.
Guillelmus de Ockham
, Opera Philosophica et Theologica, Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum Ordinatio , distinctiones II-III, ed. by S. F. Brown, O. F. M., G. Gál, O. F. M., St. Bonaventure, New York 1970.Google Scholar
Hurtado de Mendoza, Petrus
Universa philosophia in unum corpus redacta , Lyons 1624.
Ioannes Capreolus
Defensiones theologiae divi Thomae Aquinatis , vol. 5, ed. by C. Paban, T. Pégues, Tours 1900-1908. URL: http://​capricorn​.bc​.edu​/siepm​/DOCUMENTS​/CAPREOLUS​/Capreolus​_Defensiones​_5​.pdf
Ioannes Duns Scotus
, Quaestiones in Quartum Librum Sententiarum (dist. 43-48) , vol. 20, Editionova iuxta editionem Waddingi, Paris1894.Google Scholar
, Ordinatio. Liber Primus distinctio tertia , Editio Vaticana III, Civitas Vaticana 1954.Google Scholar
, Ordinatio. Liber Primus a distinctione vigesima sexta ad quadragesimam octavam , Editio Vaticana VI, Civitas Vaticana 1963.Google Scholar
, Ordinatio. Liber Secundus a distinctione prima ad tertiam , Editio Vaticana VII, Civitas Vaticana 1973.Google Scholar
, Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis , libri VI-IX, St. Bonaventure, N. Y 1997.Google Scholar
, Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima , ed. by B. C. Bazán et al.. (Opera Philosophica 5), Washington D C., St. Bonaventure, N. Y 2006.Google Scholar
Nicolaus Antonius Hispalensis
, Bibliotheca Hispana nova sive Hispanorum scriptorum qui ab anno MD. ad MDCLXXXIV floruere notitia , vol. 2, Madrid 1788.Google Scholar
Pasqualigo, Zaccaria
, Disputationes metaphysicae, pars secunda , Rome 1636.Google Scholar
Petrus Aureoli
, Commentariorum in secundum, tertium, quartum libros Sententiarum pars secunda II-IV Sent ., Rome1605.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro
, Tractatus de immortalitate animae (Abhandlung tiber die Unsterblichkeit der Seele) , ed. by B. Mojsisch, Hamburg1990.Google Scholar
Poncius, Ioannes
, Integerphilosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti , prima pars complectens Logicam, Rome1642.Google Scholar
, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Pars prima: Porphyrii Isagoge et in Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium , ed. by A. Busse, Berlin 1887.Google Scholar
Pavur, Claude, S. J..
, The Ratio Studiorum: The Official Plan for Jesuit Education , Saint Louis, Missouri2005.Google Scholar
Ribadeneira, Petrus
, Bibliotheca Scriptorum Societatis Iesu , ed. by P. Alegambe and N. Sotvell, Rome 1676.Google Scholar
Soto, Domingo
In Porphyrii Isagogen, Aristotelis Categorias, librosque de Demonstratione commentaria, Venice 1587 (reprint: Frankfurt 1967).
Spade, Paul Vincent
(ed. and transl.), Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham , Indianapolis, Indiana 1994.Google Scholar
Thomae de Sutton
De natura generis (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/xpg​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
Thomas de Aquino
Summa Theologiae (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/iopera​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
De ente et essentia (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/iopera​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
Quaestio disputata de anima (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/iopera​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
Quaestiones disputatae depotentia (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/iopera​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
Summa contra Gentiles (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/iopera​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona)
Quaestiones de quolibet (digital edition of Enrique Alarcón, 2011). URL: http://​www​.corpusthomisticum​.org​/iopera​.html (Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona) Thomas de Vio Caietanus, Opuscula omnia, Lyons 1587 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 1995).
Summa totius theologiae S. Thomae de Aquino , pars prima, Venice 1588 (reprint: Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2000).
Vázquez, Gabriel
Commentaria ac disputationes in primam partem S. Thomae , t. 2, Ingolstadt 1609. URL: http://​capricorn​.bc​.edu​/siepm​/DOCUMENTS​/VAZQUEZ​/In%20Primam%20II%20 1609​.pdf

Secondary literature

Abercrombie, Nigel
1938, Saint Augustine and French Classical Thought ,Oxford 1938.Google Scholar
Abranches, Cassiano Dos Santos
1956, “A Teoria dos Universais em Pedro da Fonseca,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 12/3 (1956), 291-298.Google Scholar
Aho, Tuomo
2007, “Suárez on Cognitive Intentions, ” in: Mind, Cognition and Representation: the Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima , ed. by P. J. J. M. Bakker, J. M. M. H. Thijssen (Ashgate Studies in Medieval Philosophy), Aldershot, Hampshire2007, 179-203.Google Scholar
Åkerlund, Erik
2009, “Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6/2 (2009), 159-182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alcorta, José Ignacio
1949, La teoría de los modos en Suárez , Madrid 1949.Google Scholar
Alejandro, José M.
1948, La gnoseologia del Doctor Eximio y la acusación nominalista , Santander 1948.Google Scholar
Angelelli, Ignacio
1998, “Aristotelian-Scholastic Ontology and Predication in the Port-Royal Logic, ” Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 24 (1998), 283-310.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger
1992, “Descartes and Scholasticism: the Intellectual Background to Descartes’ Thought, ” in: The Cambridge Companion to Descartes , ed. by J. Cottingham, Cambridge1992, 58-90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999, Descartes and the Last Scholastics , Ithaca, New York 1999.Google Scholar
Bak, Felix
1956, “Scoti schola numerosior est omnibus aliis simul sumptis,” Franciscan Studies 16 (1956), 144-165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Emmanuel J.
1996, Thomistische Metaphysik an der alten Benediktineruniversität Salzburg. Darstellung und Interpretation einer philosophischen Schule des 17./18. Jahrhunderts , Innsbruck/Wien 1996.Google Scholar
Beuchot, Mauricio H.
1989, “El problema de los universales en Juan de Santo Tomás,” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989), 33-42.Google Scholar
Bérubé, Camille
1964, La connaissance de l’individuel au moyen âge , Montréal/Paris 1964.Google Scholar
Blum, Paul Richard
1998, Philosophenphilosophie und Schulphilosophie: Typen des Philosophierens in der Neuzeit (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 27), Stuttgart 1998.Google Scholar
Boler, John F.
1982, “Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” in: The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy , ed. by N. Kretzman, A. Kenny and J. Pinborg, Cambridge 1982, 460-478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Martha B.
1998, “Universals, essences, and abstract Entities,” in: The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy , vol. 1, ed. by D. Garber, M. Ayers, Cambridge 1998, 178-211.Google Scholar
Bondi, Eugene
1966, “Predication: A Study Based in the Ars Logica of John of St. Thomas,” The Thomist 30 (1966), 260-294.Google Scholar
Borgo, Martha
2007, “Universals and the Trinity: Aquinas’s Commentary on Book I of Peter Lombard’s Sentences,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 315-342.Google Scholar
Broadie, Alexander
1985, The Circle of John Mair. Logic and Logicians in Pre-Reformation Scotland , Oxford 1985.Google Scholar
Buersmeyer, Keith
1987, “Aquinas on the 'modi significandi’,” The Modern Schoolman 64/2 (1987), 73-95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Ester
1979, Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza e la rinascita del nominalismo nella Scolastica del Seicento , Florence 1979.Google Scholar
Chabada, Michal
2005, Cognitio intuitiva et abstractiva. Die ontologischen Implikationen der Erkenntnislehre des Johannes Duns Scotus mit Gegentiberstellung zu Aristoteles und I. Kant (Veröffentlichungen der Johannes-Duns-Skotus-Akademie für Franziskanische Geistesgeschichte und Spiritualität Mönchengladbach, Bd. 18) Mönchengladbach 2005.Google Scholar
2007, Ján Duns Scotus. Vybrané kapitoly z jeho epistemológie a metafyziky , Bratislava 2007.Google Scholar
Costa, Francesco
1976, Ilp. Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M.Conv. (1603-1676). Il religioso, lo Scotista, lo scrittore , Rome 1976.Google Scholar
2006, “Dottrina immacolista del P. Bonaventura Belluto (1603-1676),” in: La Sicilia e l’immacolata. Non solo 150 anni , ed. by D. Ciccarelli, M. D. Valenza, Palermo 2006, 169-181.Google Scholar
Cresswell, John R.
1965, “Duns Scotus on the ’Common Nature’,” in: John Duns Scotus , 1265-1965, ed. by J. K. Ryan and B. M. Bonansea, Washington D C 1965, 122-132.Google Scholar
Cronin, Timothy J.
1966, Objective Being in Descartes and Suárez (Analecta Gregoriana 154), Rome 1966.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard
2002, “Gregory of Nyssa on Universals,” Vigiliae Christianae 56/4 (2002), 372-410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003a, “Divisibility, Communicability, and Predicability in Duns Scotus’s Theories of the Common Nature,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11/1 (2003), 43-63.Google Scholar
2003b, “Duns Scotus on Divine Substance and the Trinity,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11/2 (2003), 181-201.Google Scholar
2010, “Duns Scotus on the Semantic Content of Cognitive Acts and Species,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 10 (2010), 135-154.Google Scholar
Crowley, Bonaventure M.
1948, “The Life and Works of Bartholomew Mastrius, O. F. M. Conv. (1602-1673),” Franciscan Studies 8 (1948), 97-152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalbiez, Roland
1929, “Les sources scolastiques de la théorie cartésienne de l’être objectif : A propos du « Descartes » de M. Gilson,” Revue d’Histoire de la Philosophie 3 (1929), 464-472.Google Scholar
Darós, William R.
1980, “Significado y conocimiento según Juan de Santo Tomás,” Rivista Rosmiana 74 (1980), 371-391.Google Scholar
Darge, Rolf
2004, Suúrez’ transzendentale Seinsauslegung und die Metaphysiktradition (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 80), Leiden/Boston 2004.Google Scholar
Deely, John N.
2008, Descartes & Poinsot. The Crossroads of Signs and Ideas , vol. 2 in the “Postmodernity in Philosophy” Poinsot Trilogy: Contrasting the Way of Signs to the Way of Ideas, Semiotics to Epistemology, Scranton/London 2008.Google Scholar
Degl' Innocenti, Umberto
1969, “Il principio d’individuazione dei corpi e Giovanni di S. Tommaso,” Aquinas 12 (1969), 59-99.Google Scholar
De Carvalho, Mário S.
2007, “The Coimbra Jesuits’ Doctrine on Universals (1577-1606),” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 531-543.Google Scholar
De Libera, Alain
1996, La querelle des universaux. De Platon á la fin du Moyen Âge , Paris 1996.Google Scholar
De Scorraille, Raoul
1911, François Suarez de la Compagnie de Jésus, d’après ses letters, ses autres écrits inédits et un grand nombre de documents nouveaux , 2 vols., Paris 1911.Google Scholar
De Vries, Josef
1949, “Die Erkenntnislehre des Franz Suárez und der Nominalismus,” Scholastik 20-24 (1949), 321-349.Google Scholar
Di Liso, Saverio
2000, Domingo de Soto: dalla logica alla scienza , Bari 2000.Google Scholar
Di Vona, Piero
1994, I concetti trascendenti in Sebastián Izquierdo e nella Scolastica del Seicento (Libertà della mente 3), Naples 1994.Google Scholar
Doyle, John P.
1984, “Prolegomena to a Study of Extrinsic Denomination in the Work of Francis Suarez, S. J.,” Vivarium 22/2 (1984), 121-160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987, “Suarez on Truth and Mind-Dependent Beings: Implication for a Unified Semiotic,” in: Semiotics 1983 , ed. by J. Evans and J. N. Deely, New York 1987, 121-133.Google Scholar
1994, “Poinsot on the Knowability of Beings of Reason,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68/3 (1994), 337-362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010, “Francisco Suárez on the Interpretation of Laws,” in: Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, S. J. (1548-1617) , ed. by V. M. Salas, Leuven 2010, 357-387.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles
1993, “Bref catalogue des oeuvres de saint Thomas,” in: Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin. Sa personne et son oeuvre , J.-P. Torrell, Paris 1993, 483-525.Google Scholar
Fichter, Joseph H.
1940, Man of Spain. Francis Suarez , New York 1940.Google Scholar
Forlivesi, Marco
1994, “Le edizioni del ’Cursus theologicus’ di Joannes a S. Thoma,” Divus Thomas 97/3 (1994), 9-56.Google Scholar
2000, “Materiali per una descrizione della disputa e dell’esame di laurea in età moderna,” in: Dalla prima alla seconda Scolastica. Paradigmi e percorsi storiografici , ed. by A. Ghisalberti (Philosophia - Studio Domenicano 28), Bologna2000, 252-279.Google Scholar
2002a, “La distinction entre concept formel et concept objectif: Suárez, Pasqualigo, Mastri,” Les Études philosophiques 1 (2002), 3-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002b, Scotistarum princeps. Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) e il suo tempo (Fonti e studi francescani 11), Padua2002.Google Scholar
2006a, “A Man, an Age, a Book,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , atti del Convegno di studi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673), Meldola - Bertinoro, 20-22 settembre 2002, ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 23-144.Google Scholar
2006b, “The Nature of Transcendental Being and Its Contraction to Its Inferiors in the Thought of Mastri and Belluto,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi, Padua2006, 261-337.Google Scholar
2008, “C’è una filosofia nell’opera di Francisco Suàrez? Il caso della dottrina sul ‘verbum mentis’ tra ‘auctoritates’ e argomenti di ragione,” Rinascimento 48 (2008), 397-450.Google Scholar
Fraile, Guillermo
1978, Historia de la filosofia III. Del humanismo a la ilustración (siglos XV-XVIII ) (Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos), Madrid 1978.Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J.
1984, “Review of Suarez on lndividuation, Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and its Principle, transl. with an introd. and glossary by Jorge J. E. Gracia, Milwaukee 1982,“ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (1984), 419-421. URL: http://​www​.nd​.edu​/~afreddos​/papers​/gracia​.htm. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuetscher, Lorenz
1933, Akt und Potenz, Eine kritisch-systematische Auseinandersetzung mit dem neueren Thomismus , Innsbruck1933.Google Scholar
Furton, Edward J.
1997, “The Constitution of the Object in Immanuel Kant and John Poinsot,” The Review of Metaphysics 51/1 (1997), 55-75.Google Scholar
Galluzzo, Gabrielle
2003, “Met. Z 13 in the Contemporary Debate and in Aquinas’s Interpretation,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 14 (2003), 159-226.Google Scholar
2004, “Aquinas on Common Nature and Universals,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 71/1 (2004), 131-171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008, “The Problem of Universals and Its History. Some General Considerations,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 19 (2008), 335-369.Google Scholar
2011, “Two senses of Universal. Avicenna’s Doctrine of Essence and Aquinas’s View on Individuation,” in: The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics , ed. by D. N. Hasse, A. Bertolacci (Scientia Graeco-Arabica 7), Berlin, Boston 2011, 309-338.Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, Alessandro
2006, “Mastri e la storia della filosofia medievale,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 145-149.Google Scholar
Giacon, Carlo
1941, Guglielmo di Occam: saggio storico-critico sulla formazione e sulla decadenza della Scolastica , Milan 1941.Google Scholar
1946, La Seconda Scolastica, Vol. II: Precedenze teoretiche ai problemi giuridici. Toledo, Pereira, Fonseca, Molina, Suarez , Milan 1946.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne
1959, Johannes Duns Scotus. Einführung in die Grundgedanken seiner Lehre , Dusseldorf 1959.Google Scholar
Goris, Wouter
2009, “Padua 1500 - The Medieval Debate on the First Known Revisited,” in: Der Aristotelismus an den Europäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit , ed. by R. Darge, E. J. Bauer, G. Frank, Stuttgart2009, 83-98.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E.
1991, “Suarez’s Conception of Metaphysics: A Step in the Direction of Mentalism?,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65/3 (1991), 287-309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992, Philosophy and Its History: Issues in Philosophical Historiography (SUNY Series in Philosophy) Albany, N. Y 1992.Google Scholar
1993, “Suárez and Metaphysical Mentalism: The Last Visit,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/3 (1993), 349-354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994, “Cutting the Gordian Knot of Ontology: Thomas’s Solution to the Problem of Universals,” in: Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy , ed. by D. M. Gallagher (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy Series 28), Washington D C 1994, 16-36.Google Scholar
Grajewski, Maurice J.
1944, The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus. A Study in Metaphysics , Washington D C 1944.Google Scholar
1946, “John Ponce, Franciscan Scotist of the Seventeenth Century,” Franciscan Studies 6 (1946), 54-92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gredt, Joseph
1961, Elementa Philosophiae Aristotelico-Thomisticae , 2 vols., Barcelona/Freiburg in Breisgau/Rome/New York 1961.Google Scholar
Guil, Blanes F.
1956, “Las raices de la doctrina de Juan de santo Tomás acerca del universal lógico,” Estudios filosóficos 5 (1956), 215-232.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen
2009, Descartes on Forms and Mechanicism , Cambridge/New York 2009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Daniel
2008, “Suárez on Material Substance. Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites,” Organon F 15/4 (2008), 423-438.Google Scholar
2009, Kdo byl Frantisek Suárez? Život a dílo “Vynikajícího doktora” (Studijní texty, XLIII) Olomouc 2009.Google Scholar
2010a, “Metaphysics of Universals in John Poinsot’s Material Logic,” in: Thomas Aquinas and Thomism Today , ed. by H. K. Bulscú, Budapest 2010, 151-162.Google Scholar
2010b, “Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza’s (Mis)interpretation of Aquinas,” in: Francisco Suárez and his Legacy. The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy , ed. by M. Sgarbi (Metafisica e storia della metafisica 35), Milan 2010, 105-140.Google Scholar
2010c, “Bartholomew Mastrius (1602-1673) and John Punch (1599 or 1603-1661) on the Common Nature and Universal Unity,” in: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, vol. 84: Philosophy and Language>, ed. by R. E. Houser, T. Osborne (2010), 145-166.Google Scholar
2011a, “K objektivnímu bytí u Suáreze. Poznámka ke studii Jana Palkosky ‘Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu’,” Studia Neoaristotelica 8/1 (2011), 95-105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b, “Suárezova teorie poznání a její vztah k tomismu,” Filosofický časopis 59/6 (2011), 865-896.Google Scholar
2011c, “Reifikace hylemorfických principů, substanciální jednota člověka a nesmrtelnost lidské duše ve filosofii F. Suáreze,” in: Pojetí člověka v dějinách a současnosti filosofie , ed. By T. Nejeschleba, V. Němec, M. Recinová, Brno 2011, 139-152.Google Scholar
2011d, Suárez a jeho metafyzika. Od pojmu jsoucna přes transcendentální jednotu k druhům transcendentální jednoty , Praha2011.Google Scholar
2011e, “The Role of Trinitarian Theology in Universals. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673) and Bonaventura Belluto (1600-1676),” in: Herausforderung durch Religion? Begegnungen der Philosophie mit Religionen in Mittelalter und Renaissance , ed. by G. Krieger, Würzburg 2011, 268-284.Google Scholar
2012a, “John Poinsot (1589-1644) on the Universale Materialiter Sumptum: A Dual View-point,” The Modern Schoolman 89/1-2, Special Issue: “The Variety of Second Scholasticism”, ed. by D. Heider (2012), 47-63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b, "Suárez and Javellus on Transcendentals and Divisions of Being,” in: Proceedings of 12th SIEPM-Congress “Universality of Reason - Plurality of Philosophies in the Middle Ages ”, ed. by A. Musco et al.., Palermo 2012, 849-859.Google Scholar
2012c, “Úvod do problematiky univerzálií v první a druhé scholastice,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 11-31.Google Scholar
2012d, “Teorie společné přirozenosti a esence ve druhé scholastice,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 208-233.Google Scholar
Heider, Daniel, et al.
(2012e, “Filip Fabri OFM Conv. († 1630) o společné přirozenosti ve Philosophia naturalis (1602) a kritická odpověd’ Bartoloměje Mastria OFM Conv. († 1673),” in: Františkánský kontext teologického a filosofického myšleni , ed. by P. Hlavácek, Europeana Pragensia 4 - Historia Franciscana 4), Praha 2012, 114-129.Google Scholar
Heider, Daniel
2013, “Abstraction, Intentionality, & Moderate Realism. The Ontology & Epistemology of Universals in Francisco Suárez & John Poinsot,” in: Hircocervi & Other Metaphysical Wonders . Essays in Honor of John P. Doyle (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 84) , ed. by V. M. Salas, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2013, 177-211.Google Scholar
Hernández, Miguel C.
1949, “La intencionalidad en la Filosofía de Franciso Suárez,” in: Actas del Congreso International de filosofia Barcelona 1948 , Madrid 1949, 315-337.Google Scholar
Hickman, Larry
1980, Modern Theories of Higher Level Predicates: Second Intentions in the Neuzeit , München1980.Google Scholar
Hoeres, Walter
1961, “Bewusstsein und Erkenntnisbild bei Suárez,” Scholastik 36 (1961), 192-216.Google Scholar
Honnefelder, Ludger
1984, “Natura communis,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 6, ed. by J. Ritter and K. Grunder, Basel1984, 494-504.Google Scholar
Heider, Daniel
1990, Scientia transcendens. Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit , Hamburg1990.Google Scholar
Hull, Gordon
2006, “Hobbes’s Radical Nominalism,” Epoché 11/1 (2006), 201-223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Bernhard
1936, “Zur Philosophie der Scotisten des 17. Jahrhunderts,” Franziskanische Studien 17 (1936), 150-175.Google Scholar
2004, Jezuité v přírodnich vědách a ve filosofii 17. a 18. století , Olomouc2004.Google Scholar
King, Peter
1992, “Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and the Individual Differentia,” Philosophical Topics 20/2 (1992), 50-76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005, “Duns Scotus on Singular Essences,” Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale 30 (2005), 111-137.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula
2003, “Natures: the Problem of Universals,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy , ed. by A. S. McGrade, Cambridge2003, 196-207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knebel, Sven K.
1999, “The Early Modern Rollback of Merely Extrinsic Denomination,” in: Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy , ed. by S. F. Brown, acts of the international colloquium held at Boston College June 14-16 1996 (Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 7), Turnhout1999, 317-331.
2001a, “Verworrenheit I,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 11, ed. by J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel, Basel2001, 1014-1017.Google Scholar
2001b, “Universalien, I. Antike; Mittelalter,” in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , Bd. 11, ed. by J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel, Basel 2001, 179-187.Google Scholar
2011, Suarezismus. Erkenntnistheoretisches aus dem Nachlass des Jesuitengenerals Tirso González de Santalla (1624-1705) , Abhandlung und Edition (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 51), Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kobusch, Theo
1987, Sein und Sprache. Historische Grundlegung einer Ontologie der Sprache (Studien zur Problemgeschichte der antiken und mittelalterlichen Philosophie 11), Leiden/ New York/Copenhagen/Cologne 1987.Google Scholar
Koláček, Josef
2006, “Ratio studiorum. Geneze - struktura - hlavní cíle,” Studia Comeniana et historica 75-76 (2006), 19-31.Google Scholar
Kraml, Hans
1995, “Beobachtungen zum Ursprung der ‘distinctio formalis’,” in: Via Scoti. Methodologica ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti , atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale, Roma9-11. Marzo 1993, vol. 1, ed. by L. Sileo, Rome 1995, 305-318.Google Scholar
Kraus, Johannes
1927, Die Lehre des Johannes Duns Skotus O. F. M. von der Natura communis. Ein Beitrag zum Universalienproblem in der Scholastik (Studia Friburgensia), Freiburg (Schweiz) 1927.Google Scholar
Lalla, Sebastian
2010, “Die Interpretation von ‘De anima’ bei Francisco Suárez,” in: Der Aristotelismus an den Europäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit , ed. by R. Darge, E. J. Bauer, G. Frank, Stuttgart2010, 235-248.Google Scholar
Lechner, Matthias
1911, Die Erkenntnislehre des Suárez , Fulda 1911.Google Scholar
Leinsle, Ulrich G.
2006, Dilinganae Disputationes. Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen 1555-1648 , Regensburg 2006.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Joseph
1929, Das akausale Zusammenwirken (sympathia) der Seelenvermögen in der Erkenntnislehre des Suarez , München 1929.Google Scholar
Madeira, João
2006, Pedro da Fonseca's “Isagoge Philosophica” and the Predicables from Boethius to the Lovanienses , doctoral thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven 2006 URL: [https://​lirias​.kuleuven​.be​/bitstream​/1979​/409​/5​/thesis​-docto​.pdf].
Mahieu, León
1921, François Suarez, sa philosophie et les rapports qu’elle a avec sa théologie , Paris1921.Google Scholar
Manser, Gallus M.
1934, “Die Universalienlehre im Lichte von Akt und Potenz,” Divus Thomas 12 (1934), 385-407.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques
1937, The Degrees of Knowledge , transl. by B. Wall and M. R. Adamson, London1937.Google Scholar
Marrone, Francesco
2008, “Descartes e la tradizione scotista. Gli antecedenti storici della nozione di realitas obiectiva,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 279-302.Google Scholar
Martins, António M.
2006, “The Conimbricenses,” in: Intellect et imagination dans la Philosophie Médiévale , actes du XI Congrés International de Philosophie Médiévale de la S.I.E.P.M. (Porto, du 26 au 31 août 2002), ed. by M. C. Pacheco, J. Meirinhos, Turnhout 2006, 101-117.Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, Stephan
1997, Die Spur des Zeichens. Das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit , Berlin/New York 1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen
1997, “Suárez, Nominalism, and Modes,” in: Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery , ed. by K. White (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 29), Washington D C 1997, 226-256.Google Scholar
Mertz, Donald W.
2004, “The Nature and Necessity of Composite Simples, e.g., Ontic Predicates,” Metaphysica. International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics 5/1 (2004), 89-133. URL: http://​www​.metaphysica​.de​/texte​/mp2004​_1​-Mertz​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Millett, Benignus
1968, “Irish Scotists at St. Isidore’s College, Rome, in the Seventeenth Century,” in: De doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti , vol. IV: Scotismus decursu saeculorum, Rome1968, 399-419.Google Scholar
Minges, Parthenius
1930, Ioannis Duns Scoti doctrina philosophica et theologica quoad res praecipuas proposita et exposita , vol. I: Doctrina philosophica, Theologia fundamentalis, Rome 1930, 67-106.Google Scholar
Montanari, Antonio
1883, Gli uomini illustri di Faenza , Faenza 1883.Google Scholar
Mooney, Canice
1958, “The Writings of Father Luke Wadding, O. F. M.,” Franciscan Studies 18/3-4 (1958), 225-239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Hermann J.
1968, Die Lehre vom verbum mentis in der spanischen Scholastik. Untersuchungen zur historischen Entwicklung und zum Verständnis dieser Lehre bei Toletus, den Conimbricensern und Suarez , Münster1968.Google Scholar
Norena, Carlos P.
1981, “Ockham and Suárez on the Ontological Status of Universal Concepts,” The New Scholasticism 55/3 (1981), 348-362.Google Scholar
Novák, Lukás
2006, “Scoti de conceptu entis doctrina a Mastrio retractata et contra Poncium propugnata,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 237-259.Google Scholar
2012, “Ponciova syntéza ultrarealismu s nominalismem na pozadí barokně-scotistické teorie obecnin,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budéjovice 2012, 234-257.Google Scholar
Novák, Lukáš, Dvořák, Petr
2007, Úvod do logiky aristotelské tradice , České Budějovice 2007.Google Scholar
Novotný, Daniel D.
2008, “Forty-Two Years after Suárez. Mastri and Belluto’s Development of the Classical’ Theory of Entia Rationis” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 473-498.Google Scholar
2009, “In Defense of Baroque Scholasticism,” Studia Neoaristotelica 6/2 (2009), 209-233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012, “Teorie obecnin Sebastiana Izquierda (1601-1681),” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budéjovice 2012, 258-280.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Andrew J.
1964, “Scotus on Essence and Existence,” The New Scholasticism 38/1 (1964), 61-77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Joseph
1957, “The number of Terms in the Suarezian Discussion on Essence and Being,” The Modern Schoolman 34/3 (1957), 147-191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971, “Common nature: A point of comparison between Thomistic and Scotistic metaphysics,” in: Inquiries into Medieval Philosophy. A Collection in Honor of Francis P. Clarke , ed. by J. F. Ross (Contributions in Philosophy 4), Greenwood, Westport 1971, 185-209.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert
1998, “Aquinas and the Content Fallacy,” The Modern Schoolman 75/4 (1998), 293-314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003, “Cognition,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus , ed. by T. Williams, Cambridge2003, 285-311.Google Scholar
Peccorini, Francisco L.
1972, “Suárez’s Struggle with the Problem of the One and the Many,” The Thomist 36 (1972), 433-471.Google Scholar
1974, “Knowledge of the Singular: Aquinas, Suárez and Recent Interpreters,” The Thomist 38 (1974), 605-655.Google Scholar
Pereira, José
2007, Suárez. Between Scholasticism & Modernity (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 52), Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2007.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik
2002, Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter , Frankfurt am Main 2002.Google Scholar
Peroutka, David
2010, “Imagination, Intellect and Premotion. A Psychological Theory of Domingo Báñez,” Studia Neoaristotelica 7/2 (2010), 107-115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012, “Sémantika abstraktnich pojmů v tomismu druhé scholastiky,” Studia Neoaristotelica, Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice , ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 193-207.Google Scholar
Pessin, Andrew
2008, “Descartes’ Theory of Ideas,” in: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Fall 2008 Edition. URL: http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/fall2008​/entries​/descartes​-ideas/Google Scholar
Pich, Roberto Hofmeister
2012, “Alfonso Briceño (1587-1668) and the Controversiae on John Duns Scotus‘s Philosophical Theology: The Case of Infinity,” The Modern Schoolman 89/1-2, Special Issue: “The Variety of Second Scholasticism,” ed. by D. Heider 2012, 65-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinborg, Jan 1974, “Zum Begriff der ‘Intentio Secunda’. Radulphus Brito, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli in Diskussion,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin 13 (1974), 49-59.Google Scholar
Pini, Giorgio
2002, Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus. An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Categories in the late thirteenth century (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 77), Leiden/Boston/Cologne 2002.Google Scholar
2004, Absoluta consideratio naturae: Tommaso d’Aquino e la dottrina avicenniana dell’ essenza,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004), 387-438.Google Scholar
2007, “Scotus on Universals: A Reconsideration,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007), 395-409.Google Scholar
Poppi, Antonio
1966, “Il contributo dei formalisti padovani al problema delle distinzioni,” in: Problemi e figure della scuola scotista del Santo , ed. by A. Poppi (Pubblicazioni della Provincia dei Frati minori conventuali 5), Padua 1966, 601-790.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Douglas B.
1994, “The Significance for Cognitive Realism of the Thought of John Poinsot,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68/3 (1994), 409-424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renemann, Michael
2006, “Mastri on ‘praecisio obiectiva’,” in: Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sulpensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastri (1602-1673) , ed. by M. Forlivesi (Subsidia mediaevalia Patavina 8), Padua 2006, 399-414.Google Scholar
2010a, “The Mind’s Focus as an Efficient Cause: Francisco Suárez’s Re-interpretation of the Traditional Understanding of the Idea,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84/4 (2010), 693-710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b, Gedanken als Wirkursachen. Francisco Suárez zur geistigen Hervorbringung (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 49), Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, Teresa
1998, Francisco Suarez. Cognitio singularis materialis: De anima (Vestigia 16), Bari1998.Google Scholar
Risse, Wilhelm
1964, Die Logik der Neuzeit , Bd. 1: 1500-1640, Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt 1964.Google Scholar
Rivera de Ventosa, Enrique
1982, “Significación de Juan de S. Tomás en la historia del pensamiento,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 38/4 (1982), 581-592.Google Scholar
Roig Gironella, Juan
1961, “Para la historia del nominalismo y de la reacción antinominalista de Suárez,” Pensamiento: Revista de investigación e informatión filosófica 17 (1961), 279-310.Google Scholar
Ross, James F.
1962, “Suarez on ‘Universals’,” The Journal of Philosophy 59/23 (1962), 736-748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen
2012, “Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez’s Soul,” in: The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez , ed. by B. Hill & H. Lagerlund, Oxford/New York 2012, 154-172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowski, Aleksander
1937, “De fundamento metaphysico nostrae cognitionis universalis secundum D. Thomam,” in: Acta Pont. Academiae Romanae S. Thomae Aquinatis et Religionis Catholicae , vol. III, Rome 1937, 103-112.Google Scholar
Saxlová, Tereza
1997, “Povaha obecného pojmu u Viléma Ockhama. Od teorie představy (fictum) k teorii rozumového aktu (intellectio),” Filosofický časopis 45/2 (1997), 179-203.Google Scholar
Scapin, Pietro
1976, La metafisica scotista a Padova dal XV al XVII secolo , in: Storia e cultura al Santo , ed. by A. Poppi (Fonti e studi per la storia del Santo di Padova, vol. III, 1), Vicenza 1976, 485-538.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B.
1979, “Filippo Fabri’s ‘Philosophia Naturalis Io. Duns Scoti’ and its Relation to Paduan Aristotelianism,” in: La tradizione scotista veneto-padovana , ed. by C. Bérubé, Padua 1979, 305-312.Google Scholar
Schmutz, Jacob
2002, “L’héritage des Subtils. Cartographie du Scotisme de l’âge classique,” Les études philosophiques 1 (2002), 51-81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007, “Hurtado et son double. La querelle sur les images mentales dans la scholastique moderne,” in: Questions sur l’intentionnalité , ed. by L. Couloubaritsis, A. Mazzú (Recueil, n°17), Brussels2007, 157-232.Google Scholar
2008, “Le petit scotisme du Grand Siécle. Etude doctrinale et documentaire sur la philosophie au Grand Couvent des Cordeliers de Paris, 1517-1771,” Quaestio. Annuario di storia della metafisica 8 (2008), 365-472.Google Scholar
Schobinger, Jean-Pierre
(ed) 1998, Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, Bd. 1: Allgemeine Themen. Iberische Halbinsel. Italien (Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie), Basel1998.Google Scholar
Secada, Jorge
2012, “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations,” in: InterpretingSuárez. Critical Essays , ed. by D. Schwartz, Cambridge/New York 2012, 62-88.Google Scholar
Sladeczek, Franz M.
1926, “Die intellektuelle Erfassung der sinnfälligen Einzeldinge nach der Lehre des hl. Thomas von Aquin,” Scholastik 1/2 (1926), 184-215.Google Scholar
Sousedík, Stanislav
1983, Valerián Magni (1586-1661). Kapitola z kulturních dějin Čech 17. stoleti , Praha 1983.Google Scholar
1998, “Arriagas Universalienlehre,” in: Rodrigo de Arriaga (†1667). Philosoph und Theologe , ed. by T. Saxlová and S. Sousedík, Praha 1998, 41-49.Google Scholar
2004, “Pomyslná jsoucna (entia rationis) v aristotelské tradici 17. století,” Filosofický časopis 52/4 (2004), 533-544.Google Scholar
2005, “Filosofické dílo pražského františkána Bernarda Sanniga OFM (†1704),” in: Historia Franciscana II , ed. by P. R. Beneš, P. Hlaváček, Kostelni Vydří 2005, 151-163.Google Scholar
2006, Identitni teorie predikace , Praha 2006.Google Scholar
2009, Philosophie der frühen Neuzeit in den böhmischen Ländern , Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt 2009.Google Scholar
South, James B.
2001a, “Suárez and the Problem of External Sensation,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10/2 (2001), 217-240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b, “Francisco Suárez on Imagination,” Vivarium 39/1 (2001), 119-158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002, “Singular and Universal in Suárez’s Account of Cognition,” Review of Metaphysics 55/4 (2002), 785-823.Google Scholar
2012, “Suárez, Immortality, and the Soul’s Dependence on the Body," in: The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez , ed. by B. Hill, H. Lagerlund, Oxford/New York 2012, 121-136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spruit, Leen
1995, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, vol. II: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of the Intelligibile Species in Modern Philosophy (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 49), Leiden/New York/Cologne 1995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008, “Renaissance Views of Active Perception,” in: Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy , ed. by S. Knuuttila, P. Kärkkäinen (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 6), Dordrecht 2008, 203-224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Martin W. F.
2009, “Punch’s Riposte: The Irish Contribution to Early Modern Scotism from Maurice O’Fihely O. F. M. Conv. to Anthony Rourke O. F. M. Obs.,” in: The Irish Contribution to European Scholastic Thought , ed. by J. McEvoy, M. Dunne, Dublin 2009, 137-191.Google Scholar
Svoboda, David
2012a, “Absolutně uvažovaná přirozenost. Petr Fonseca a jeho významní středověcí předchůdci,” Studia theologica 50/4 (2012), 102-126.Google Scholar
2012b, “Koncepce univerzálií Dominika de Soto O. P.,” Studia Neoaristotelica , Supplementum I: Univerzálie ve scholastice, ed. by D. Heider, D. Svoboda, České Budějovice 2012, 172-192.Google Scholar
2012c, Metafyzické myšlení Tomáse Akvinského , Praha 2012.Google Scholar
2012d, “The Ratio of Unity: Positive or Negative? The case of Thomas Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86/1 (2012), 47-70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teixidor, Alois
1912, “De universalibus iuxta Doctorem Eximium Franciscum Suarez,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 25/4 (1912), 445-461.Google Scholar
Tropia, Anna
2010, “Suárez as a Scotist: the Portrait of the Doctor Eximius in Losada’s Commentary on the Soul,” in: Francisco Suárez and his Legacy. The Impact of Suárezian Metaphysics and Epistemology on Modern Philosophy , ed. by M. Sgarbi (Metafisica e storia della metafisica 35), Milan 2010, 89-101.Google Scholar
Tyn, Thomas M.
1988, “L’essere nel pensiero di Giovanni di San Tommaso O. P.,” in: Giovanni di San Tommaso nel IV centenario della sua nascita (1589). Il suo pensiero filosofico, teologico e mistico - atti del convegno di studio della Societá Internazionale S. Tommaso d’Aquino (SITA)>, Roma 25-28 novembre 1988, Rome 1988, 21-55.
Tweedale, Martin M.
1984, “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Views on Universals,” Phronesis 29/3 (1984), 279-303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999a, Scotus vs. Ockham - A Medieval Dispute over Universals. Vol. II: Commentary (Studies in the History of Philosophy, volume 50 B), Lewiston, N. Y 1999.Google Scholar
1999b, “Locke on Universals: the Fruit of Ockham’s Dilemma?,” in: Meeting of the Minds. The Relations between Medieval and Classical Modern European Philosophy, acts of the international colloquium held at Boston College June 14-16 1996, ed. by S. F. Brown (Rencontres de philosophie médiévale 7), Turnhout1999, 235-244.Google Scholar
Uedelhofen, Matthias
1916, Die Logik Petrus Fonsecas , Bonn 1916.Google Scholar
Van der Lecq, Ria
2000, “Domingo de Soto on Universals and the Ontology of Intentions,” in: Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain, acts of the 12th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, held at the University of Navarre (Pamplona, 26-30 May 1997), ed. by I. Angelleli, P. Pérez-Ilzarbe (Philosophische Texte und Studien 54), Hildesheim 2000, 309-325.Google Scholar
Wells, Norman J.
1962, “Suarez, Historian and Critic of the Modal Distinction between Essential Being and Existential Being,” The New Scholasticism 36/4 (1962), 419-444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993a, “Descartes’ Idea and Its Sources,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/4 (1993), 513-535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993b, Esse Cognitum and Suárez Revisited,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67/3 (1993), 339-348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007, “Mastrius on Esse Cognitum ,” in: Laudemus viros gloriosos : Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, CSB., ed. by R. E. Houser (Thomistic Studies), Notre Dame, Indiana 2007, 327-361.Google Scholar
Winance, Eleuthére
1985, “Echo de la querelle du psychologisme et de l’antipsychologisme dans l Ars Logica de Jean Poinsot,” Semiotica 56-3/4 (1985), 225-259.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F.
2000, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas. From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Monographs of the Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy 1), Washington D C 2000.Google Scholar
Wöhler, Hans-Ulrich
, ed 1992, Texte zum Universalienstreit. Vom Ausgang der Antike bis zur Frühscholastik , Bd. 1, Berlin1992. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, Allan B.
1946, The Transcendentals and their Function in the Metaphysics of Duns Scotus (Franciscan Institute Publications, Philosophy Series 3), Washington D C 1946.Google Scholar


BIC Subject: HPCB – Western philosophy: Medieval & Renaissance, c 500 to c 1600
BISAC Subject: PHI016000 – PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2013043334 | Marc record