Article published in:
Advances in Research on Semantic Roles
Edited by Seppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga
[Benjamins Current Topics 88] 2016
► pp. 2749


Bickel, Balthasar
2007Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11. 239–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Eric
2013Zenzontepec Chatino valency patterns. In Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://​valpal​.info​/languages​/zenzontepec​-chatino)Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2010Semantic maps as metrics on meaning. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). 70–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Inducing semantic roles. In: Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 23–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55. 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann
(eds.) 2008The typology of semantic alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre
2008Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change, 163–216. (Studies in Language Companion Series 106). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Furrer, Reinhard, Douglas Nychka & Stephen Sain
2012Fields: Tools for spatial data. R package.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1974Concessives, conditionals, and verbs of volition. Foundations of Language 11(3). 341–359.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
(eds.) 2013Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (http://​www​.valpal​.info)Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Lingustic Typology 15(3). 535–567.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Iren Hartmann
2014Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Bernard Comrie & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.), Valency classes: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E.
1997Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1(3). 279–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2006Participant roles, thematic roles and syntactic relations. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations: In honor of Masayoshi Shibatani, 153–174. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2013Alignment preferences in basic and derived ditransitives. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 263–289. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2005Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
1998Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2008Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split-subject marking. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 121–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team.
2012R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2009Motion events in parallel texts: A study in primary-data typology. Bern: University of Bern Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw
2012Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3). 671–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar