Article published in:
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 101124
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

de Santis, Leonardo & Luigi Battezzato
2020. Aoristo e perfetto nel greco tardo-antico. Glotta 96:1  pp. 246 ff. Crossref logo
Guérois, Rozenn & Koen Bostoen
2018. On the origins of passive allomorphy in Cuwabo (Bantu P34). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 36:3  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Rozwadowska, Bożena, Arkadiusz Nowak & Anna Bondaruk
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Allan, Rutger
2003The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study of Polysemy. Amsterdam: J. Gieben.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2013Construction-Based Historical-Comparative Reconstruction. Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar ed. by Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson
2012Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method. Sign-Based Construction Grammar ed. by Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag, 257–308. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Valéria Molnár
2003The Passive in Icelandic — Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Structures of Focus and Grammatical Relations ed. by Jorunn Hetland & Valéria Molnár, 231–260. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedetti, Marina
2006Mehr als Passiv: Über einige Verbalmorpheme in altindogermanischen Sprachen. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 3:2.91–110.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela
1993The Reanalysis of Reflexives: A Diachronic Perspective. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
1998The Loss of the Voice Dimension between Late Latin and Early Romance. Historical Linguistics 1997: Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics ed. by Monika Schmid, Jennifer Austin & Dieter Stein, 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1888Altindische Syntax. Halle a. S.: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
1897Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter Teil. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Di Giovine, Paolo
1990–1996Studio sul perfetto indoeuropeo, Vol. I–III. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1990Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language 67:3.547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred
1908–1909Recherches sur l’emploi du passif latin à l’époque républicaine. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique 15.273–333.Google Scholar
Flobert, Pierre
1975Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les belles lettres.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes
1967Hethitisches Elementarbuch, 3rd edition, Vol. I–II. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2011Valency Changes in the History of English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1:1.106–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1987The Typology of Reflexives. (= Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 2.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
George, Coulter H.
2005Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildersleeve, Basil L.
1900Syntax of Classical Greek from Homer to Demosthenes. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1981Typology and Functional Domains. Studies in Language 5:2.163–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonda, Jan
1979The Medium in the R̥gveda. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goodwin, William W.
1978 [1894]A Greek Grammar. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Gotō, Toshifumi
1997Überlegungen zum urindogermanischen “Stativ”. Berthold Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea hoy. Actas del Coloquio de la Indogermanische Gesellschaft ed. by Emilio Crespo & José Luís, 165–192. Madrid: UAM; Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Grosse, Hermann
1889Beiträge zur Syntax des griechischen Mediums und Passivums. Dramburg: Druck von Th. Kämpf.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Thomas Müller-Bardey
2004Valency Change. Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Vol. 2 ed. by Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan, 1130–1145. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heidinger, Steffen
2010French Anticausatives: A Diachronic Perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl
1976Die Aoristbildungen von ved. vr̥t. In K. Hoffmann, Aufsätze zur Indoiranistik. Bd. 2 ed. 562–569. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. & Craig H. Melchert
2008A Grammar of the Hittite Language. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Hooker, James T.
1980Linear B: An Introduction. Bristol: Classical Press.Google Scholar
Humbert, Jean
1945Syntaxe Grecque. Paris: Librairie Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W.
1983Function and Form in the -áya-formations of the Rig Veda and Atharva Veda. (= KZ, Ergänzungsheft 31.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, Harald
1969Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. (= KZ, Ergänzungsheft 21.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jannaris, Antonius
1968 [1897]An Historical Greek Grammar, Chiefly of the Attic Dialect, as Written and Spoken from Classical Antiquity down to the Present Time, Founded upon the Ancient Texts, Inscriptions, Papyri, and Present Popular Greek. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay
1978Stative and Middle in Indo-European. (= Innsbrucker Beitrage zur Sprachwissenschaft, 23.) Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2003Hittite and the Indo-European Verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The Middle Voice. (= Typological Studies in Language, 23.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik H.H.
1979Toward a Reconstruction of the Balto-Slavic Verbal System. Lingua 49.51–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
19811st sg. middle *-H2. Indogermanische Forschungen 86.123–136.Google Scholar
1999The Armenian Causative. Annual of Armenian Linguistics 20.47–49.Google Scholar
2009Baltica & Balto-Slavica. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2010An Outline of Proto-Indo-European. In: F.H.H. Kortlandt, Studies in Germanic, Indo-European and Indo-Uralic, 37–45. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang
1968Handbuch des Gotischen. 3rd ed. München: C.H. Beck‘sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Bernhard Gerth
1963 [1898–1904]Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache. Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre. Hannover: Hannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
1999Split Causativity: Remarks on Correlations between Transitivity, Aspect, and Tense. Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity: Essays in Honour of Vladimir Nedjalkov (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 50) ed. by Werner Abraham & Leonid Kulikov, 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006aPassive and Middle in Indo-European: Reconstructing the Early Vedic Passive Paradigm. Passivization and Typology: Form and Function (= Typological Studies in Language, 68) ed. by Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö, 62–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006bThe Vedic Mediopassive Aorists, Statives and their Participles: Reconsidering the Paradigm. Themes and Tasks in Old and Middle Indo-Aryan Linguistics ed. by Bertil Tikkanen & Heinrich Hettrich, 45–63. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
2007aReciprocal Constructions in Vedic. Reciprocal Constructions, Vol. 2 (= Typological Studies in Language, 71) ed. by Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, 709–738. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bThe Reflexive Pronouns in Vedic: A Diachronic and Typological Perspective. Lingua 117:8.1412–1433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Valency-Changing Categories in Indo-Aryan and Indo-European: A Diachronic Typological Portrait of Vedic Sanskrit. Multilingualism: Proceedings of the 23rd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (= Studia Linguistica Upsaliensis, 8) ed. by Anju Saxena & Åke Viberg, 75–92. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
2011aVoice Typology. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology ed. by Jae-Jung Song, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011bPassive to Anticausative through Impersonalization: The Case of Vedic and Indo-European. Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 124) ed. by Anna Siewierska & Andrej Malchukov, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The Vedic -ya-presents: Passives and Intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan. (= Leiden Studies in Indo-European, 19.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2014aThe decline of labile syntax in Old Indo-Aryan: A diachronic typological perspective. Linguistics 52:4 (special issue: Typology of labile verbs: Focus on diachrony).1139–1165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bGrammaticalization of reciprocal pronouns in Indo-Aryan: Evidence from Sanskrit and Indo-European for a diachronic typology of reciprocal constructions. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 1:2.117–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, Martin
1996Stativ und Passivaorist im Indoiranischen. (= HS, Ergänzungsheft 39.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
2000Das Perfekt im Indoiranischen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1932Les désinences moyennes de l’indo-européen et du hittite. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 30:1.1–4.Google Scholar
1935Études indoeuropéennes I. Krakow: Gebethner & Wolff.Google Scholar
1964The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2009Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony: Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu & Johann B. Hofmann
1928Lateinische Grammatik, Bd. 2, Syntax. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2010aThe Extension of the Transitive Construction in Ancient Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 42:1.60–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bTransitivity, Intransitivity and Diathesis in Hittite. Indo-evropejskoe jazykoznanie i klassičeskaja filologija 14.133–154.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Anna Pompei & Stavros Skopeteas
2005Ancient Greek. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Macdonell, Arthur Anthony
1910Vedic Grammar. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
McMillion, Alan
2006Labile Verbs in English: Their Meaning, Behavior and Structure. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1964 [1903]Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine & Joseph Vendryes
1924Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1993The Inflectional Category of Voice: Towards a more Rigorous Definition. Causativity and Transitivity (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 23) ed. by Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky, 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neu, Erich
1968aDas hethitische Mediopassiv und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen. (= Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten, 6.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1968bInterpretation der hethitischen mediopassiven Verbalformen. (= StBoT, 5.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Renou, Louis
1925La valeur du parfait dans les hymnes védiques. (= Collection linguistique, 18.) Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Christiane
1994Das Intensivum im Vedischen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl Horst
1963aPräteritum und Medio-Passiv. Sprache 9.14–20.Google Scholar
1963bZum altirischen Passiv. Indogermanische Forschungen 68.257–275.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1943Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechischen. (= Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophische-historische Klasse, Jahrgang 1942: Nr 10.) Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner
1950Griechische Grammatik. Zweiter Band: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. (= Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, 2. Abt., 1. Teil, 2. Bd.) München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2006On the Conceptual Framework for Voice Phenomena. Linguistics 44.217–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sihler, Andrew L.
1995New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W.
1984 [1920]Greek Grammar, 13th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (rev. ed. by Gordon M. Messing.)Google Scholar
Stahl, Johann M.
1907Kritisch-historische Syntax des griechischen Verbums der klassischen Zeit. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Stang, Christian S.
1932Perfektum und Medium. Norsk tidsskrift for sprogvidenskap 6.29–39.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1990Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (4., durchgesehene Auflage.)Google Scholar
Šackov, Аndrej В.
2008Xettskie glagoly s suffiksom -nu- [Hittite Verbs with the Suffix -nu-]. Indoevropejskoe jazykoznahie i klassičeskaja filologija 12.471–474.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1904Studien zum griechischen Perfectum. Programm zur akademischen Preisverteilung, 3–24. Göttingen. [Reprinted in: Jacob Wackernagel. 1953. Kleine Schriften, 1000–1021. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.]Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1969Indogermanische Grammatik, III: Formenlehre. 1. Teil. Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1885The Roots, Verb-Forms, and Primary Derivatives of the Sanskrit Language. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar