Article published in:
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 15
References
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2013Construction-Based Historical-Comparative Reconstruction. Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar ed. by Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson
2012Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method. Sign-Based Construction Grammar ed. by Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag, 257–312. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thomas Smitherman
2009Typological Changes in the Evolution of Indo-European Syntax? Diachronica 26:2.253–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L.M.
2000Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline
2004Tmesis and Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1893–1897Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Giannakis, Giorgios K.
1997Studies in the Syntax and Semantics of the Reduplicated Presents of Homeric Greek and Indo-European. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina & Giuseppe Longobardi
2005Parametric Comparison and Language Taxonomy. Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation ed. by Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluisa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca, 149–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich
1990 [1991]Der Agens in passivischen Sätzen altindogermanischer Sprachen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hirt, Hermann
1934–1937Indogermanische Grammatik. Vols. VI–VII: Syntax. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederick H.H.
1983Proto-Indo-European Verbal Syntax. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11.307–324.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2010Bridging Typology and Diachrony: A Preliminary Questionnaire for a Diachronic Typological Study of Voice and Valency-Changing Categories. Problemy grammatiki i tipologii: sbornik statej pamjati Vladimira Petroviča Nedjalkova (1928–2009) [Issues in Grammar and Typology: A Memorial Volume for Vladimir Nedjalkov] ed. by Valentin Vydrin, Sergej Dmitrenko, Natalja Zaika, Sergej Saj, Nina Sumbatova & Viktor Xrakovskij, 139–163. Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2009Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony: Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1974Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2003Methods in Parametric Linguistics and Cognitive History. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3.101–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2004Null Objects in Latin and Greek and the Relevance of Linguistic Typology for Language Reconstruction. Proceedings of the 15th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference (= JIES Monograph, 49) ed. by Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter, 234–256. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
2012Basic Valency Orientation and the Middle Voice in Hittite. Studies in Language 36:1.1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Sarah G. Thomason
2008How Much Syntactic Reconstruction is Possible? Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 27–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1964Preliminaries to the Reconstruction of Indo-European Sentence Structure. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists, Cambridge MA ed. by Horace G. Lunt, 1035–1045. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1976Towards Proto-Indo-European Syntax: Problems and Pseudo-problems. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax ed. by Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker, & Salikoko S. Mufwene, 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar