Article published in:Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 155–172
Have-doubling constructions in historical and modern Dutch
Have-doubling constructions closely resemble periphrastic perfect tense constructions but have an additional, seemingly superfluous form of the verb have. Whilst these constructions are only found in a small number of modern Dutch dialects, they appear much more broadly in historical varieties of Dutch. In this article, I present new data from a corpus study of have-doubling constructions in Early Modern Dutch (ca. 1500-1700) which reveals both similarities and an important difference with the modern dialectal phenomenon. I argue that there are two structurally distinct types of have-doubling in this older period: one which contains a canonical adjective (i.e. with one internal argument) and one with a non-canonical adjective with a vP layer (Koeneman et al. 2011). I further show that this sheds new light on the observed link between doubling constructions and the rise of the periphrastic perfect tenses, with implications for the nature of this syntactic development.
Keywords: have-doubling, periphrastic perfect tenses, participles, syntactic change, Dutch
Published online: 03 December 2018
Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans J. Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet van der Ham
Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf N. C. J. Koeneman & Marika Lekakou
2008b “Perfect doubling.” (talk presented at the TIN-dag, 2 February, Utrecht).
Barbiers, Sjef & Hans J. Bennis
2017 “The rise of the periphrastic perfect tense in the continental West Germanic languages.” LingBuzz, December 2017, http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003206.
Coornhert, Dirck V.
Den Dikken, Marcel
Duinhoven, Antonius M.
van der Horst, Joop M.
Kern, Johan H.
Koeneman, Olaf N. C. J., Marika Lekakou & Sjef Barbiers[ p. 172 ]
Kroch, Anthony S.