Article published in:
Applied Pragmatics
Vol. 2:2 (2020) ► pp. 174–198

Task-based interactional sequences in different modalities

A comparison between computer-mediated written chat and face-to-face oral chat

| Carnegie Mellon University
Recent research on Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) showed the efficacy of using computer-mediated communication (CMC) to promote second language (L2) learning (Ziegler, 2016). However, few studies compared the interactional sequences during task-based interaction across different modalities (e.g., oral and written chat). It is thus not clear how different task modalities mediate task-based interaction and L2 learning opportunities. To fill this gap, this study compared CMC written chat and face-to-face (FTF) oral chat for interactional sequences during decision-making tasks. Participants were 20 learners of Chinese (high-elementary to intermediate level) in a U.S. university. Ten participants completed the tasks in CMC, while the other 10 completed the same tasks in FTF. The interaction data were analyzed for frequency and patterns of interactional strategies. Three types of interactional sequences emerged in both groups: orientating to tasks, suggesting actions and evaluating suggestions. CMC participants suggested actions more frequently than FTF participants. While both groups predominantly agreed with proposed suggestions, CMC dyads expressed disagreement three times more than FTF dyads. CMC dyads also used more utterances to manage task progress. Findings are discussed in terms of the interactional organizations and their potential influence on task-based language use in different modalities.
Keywords: computer-mediated communication (CMC), face-to-face interaction (FTF), TBLT, Chinese, decision-making tasks
Published online: 17 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.19010.tan
References

References

Blake, R.
(2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136.Google Scholar
(2016) Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129–142.Google Scholar
Condon, S. L., & Čech, C. G.
(1996) Discourse management strategies in face-to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions. Electronic Journal of Communication, 6(3), 65–80.Google Scholar
(2010) Discourse management in three modalities. Language at Internet, 7(6), 1–32.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
(2006) Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19(1), 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González-Lloret, M.
(2015) A practical guide to integrating technology into task-based language teaching. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2016) The construction of emotion in multilingual computer-mediated interaction. In M. T. Prior & G. Kasper (Eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction, (pp. 289–311). John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 195 ]
Herring, S.
(1999) Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C., & Zhao, Y.
(2006) Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 102–120.Google Scholar
Li, S.
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nuevo, A.
(2006) Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2009) Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 226–253). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pellettieri, J.
(2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59–86). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., & Bygate, M.
(Eds.) (2018) TBLT as a researched pedagogy: Vol. 12. John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J.
(2005) Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse. Discourse studies, 7(3), 337–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.
(2003) The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 31, 29–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 365–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y.
(Eds.) (2018) Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, X.
(2019) The effects of task modality on L2 Chinese learners’ pragmatic development: Computer-mediated written chat vs. face-to-face oral chat. System, 80, 48–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R.
(2002) Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82–99.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(Ed.) (2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge university Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wasson, C.
(2016) Integrating conversation analysis and issue framing to illuminate collaborative decision-making activities. Discourse & Communication, 10(4), 378–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Yuksel, D.
(2011) Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15, 457–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 196 ]
Zeng, G.
(2017) Collaborative dialogue in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face communication. ReCALL, 29, 257–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, N.
(2016) Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar