Article published in:The Constitution of Phenomenal Consciousness: Toward a science and theory
Edited by Steven M. Miller
[Advances in Consciousness Research 92] 2015
► pp. 445–464
The structure of phenomenal consciousness
Philosophers have largely abandoned the claim that the special sciences will ultimately reduce to microphysics in favour of the view that the special sciences trade in functional explanations. However, a careful examination of scientific practice reveals that the explanatory strategy of the special sciences is neither reductionist nor functionalist, but mechanistic. Mechanistic explanations appeal to active material entities organized so as to produce the target phenomena. We claim that phenomenal consciousness will also succumb to mechanistic explanation: it will turn out to be the activity of specific neural mechanisms in the brain. In this chapter we explore the implications of this perspective for the ontology of consciousness, arguing that it has a complex structural essence.
Published online: 17 June 2015
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A.
Brown, M.E., & Swallowe, G.E.
Fries, P., Nikolić, D., & Singer, W.
Llinás, R., Ribary, U., Contreras, D., & Pedroarena, C.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C.F.
O’Brien, G., & Opie, J.
Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H.
(2008) Essential vs. accidental properties. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/essential-accidental
Tononi, G., & Koch, C.
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J.
Waldmann, R., Chamigny, G., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C., & Lazdunski, M.