Argumentation in Political Interviews

Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency

| University of Amsterdam
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027211224 | EUR 85.00 | USD 128.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027271754 | EUR 85.00 | USD 128.00
 
In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians’ responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of winning the discussion. In addition, the soundness criteria are formulated for judging properly when the politicians’ responses are indeed reasonable.

This book is important to argumentation theorists, discourse analysts, communication scholars and all other researchers and students interested in the way in which language is used for the purpose of persuasion in a political context.

Corina Andone is Assistant Professor of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric at the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.

[Argumentation in Context, 5]  2013.  viii, 147 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Preface
vii–viii
1. Introduction
1–14
2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency
15–32
3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type
33–60
4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview
61–100
5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview
101–124
6. Conclusion
125–134
References
135–140
List of figures
141
Name index
143–144
Subject index
145–147
“[T]his is an important piece of original research that makes a welcome contribution to the study of strategic maneuvering in institutional contexts and the (critical) study of political discourse. It is very clearly written and argued, in the lucid and methodical style characteristic of pragma-dialectical research, and contains a wealth of examples from political interviews from the British media, clearly analyzed. It is an excellent contribution to the development of pragma-dialectics as a major research programme in argumentation theory and will be of use not only to researchers working within the pragma-dialectical research programme but also, more widely, to analysts of political discourse, and particularly to researchers working in Critical Discourse Analysis.”
“[H]er work creates a model from which comparative study in deliberative democracy can benefit. Different regimes, rules of public engagement, content expectations and audiences condition the practices of deliberation. What norms can be posited as universal and which are subject to discovery as invested in national political authority and custom? Are the maneuvers of journalists across the globe more common than they are varied? Andone’s gifted inquiry extends pragma-dialectics appears as an insightful tool to address the communicative and interactive dimensions of professional and political practices.”
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

No author info given
2018.  In Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time [Argumentation in Context, 15], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions [Argumentation in Context, 19], Crossref logo
Al-Hindawi, Fareed Hameed & Wafaa Sahib Mehdi Mohammed
2018. Towards an Analytical Model in Critical Pragmatics. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Andone, Corina
2015.  In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26],  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Andone, Corina
2015. Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability. Argumentation 29:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Andone, Corina
2016. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1  pp. 74 ff. Crossref logo
Andone, Corina
2017.  In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Bova, Antonio, Francesco Arcidiacono & Fabrice Clément
2017.  In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Clementson, David E.
2016. Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, With a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996-2012. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35:3  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Dahl, John Magnus R. & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2015. Review of Labrie (2014): For the Sake of Argument: Considering the Role, Characteristics and Effects of Argumentation in General Practice Consultation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:2  pp. 232 ff. Crossref logo
Demir, Yeliz
2016. Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.  In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hansson, Sten
2018. Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering. Critical Discourse Studies 15:3  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2017.  In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Kantara, Argyro
2018.  In Doing Politics [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 80],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Kauffeld, Fred J. & Beth Innocenti
2018. A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting. Argumentation 32:4  pp. 463 ff. Crossref logo
Kienpointner, Manfred
2017.  In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Okuda, Hiroko & Takeshi Suzuki
2018. Prime Minister Abe’s challenge to the Japanese Postwar Constitution. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:1  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
Pishwa, Hanna
2015.  In The Exercise of Power in Communication,  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Popa, Eugen
2013. Review of Suzuki, Kato, Kubota & Murai (2012): Proceedings of the 4th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:3  pp. 346 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.  In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2016. Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 30:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017.  In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11],  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.  In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.  In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.  In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,  pp. 517 ff. Crossref logo
Wu, Peng
2019.  In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Wu, Peng
2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation 33:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Philosophy

Philosophy
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN000000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2013013546 | Marc record